>
> - Original Message -
> The least they could have done was put an orientation sensor in the vertical
> grip.
> Odds are, if you have the thing mounted, you are shooting a % of verticals.
>
> William Robb
>
>
The D1 and and obviously the istD
On 15 Nov 2005 at 8:03, Cotty wrote:
> On 15/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I'm also
> >having some difficulty trying to fathom how a gravity based sensor
> could lead
> >to incorrect orientation too, when would it be wrong?
>
> The only time the orientation sensor gets
On 15/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm also
>having some difficulty trying to fathom how a gravity based sensor
could lead
>to incorrect orientation too, when would it be wrong?
The only time the orientation sensor gets fooled for me is when shooting
(say, artwork) looking
only if you configure it so. otherwise, it does the conversion from the
embedded JPEG by default.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Request for help or advise. The critical
Thumbs+ builds the thumbnails from the RAW file if you configure it so. it
is significantly slower when doing that.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: Request for hel
On Nov 14, 2005, at 6:08 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Really doesn't matter to me at all. 10D photos auto-orient too, but
they're often wrong. If I set an orientation in review mode on the
DS, they orient correctly in every file viewer application I've seen.
Well for those of us who don't re-orien
On 14 Nov 2005 at 16:30, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> > On 14 Nov 2005 at 12:36, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> >
> >> I do all the rotating, annotating, etc, in CS2's Bridge application.
> >> I often use iView to produce simple web pages and galler
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: Re: Request for help or advise. The critical mass is achieved...
Grrr, even the Canon 300D images are auto-oriented in the Pentax Photo
Browser,
I wonder if Pentax will actually put an orientation sensor in the next
ca
On Nov 14, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 14 Nov 2005 at 12:36, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I do all the rotating, annotating, etc, in CS2's Bridge application.
I often use iView to produce simple web pages and galleries, but
Photoshop's web generation tools are equally facile.
Grrr,
On 14 Nov 2005 at 12:36, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I do all the rotating, annotating, etc, in CS2's Bridge application.
> I often use iView to produce simple web pages and galleries, but
> Photoshop's web generation tools are equally facile.
Grrr, even the Canon 300D images are auto-oriented
I do all the rotating, annotating, etc, in CS2's Bridge application.
I often use iView to produce simple web pages and galleries, but
Photoshop's web generation tools are equally facile.
G
On Nov 14, 2005, at 7:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just use BBPro to rotate any vertical shots,
I just use BBPro to rotate any vertical shots, then use the html tool to make
the web
page.
Does a decent job that way.
Once i get used toPSCS on the ibook and get a little more used to the "Mac
ways", i'll
probably just use
the web gallery again. It does a decent job.
Dave
I can't say. BB does not produce a Mac OS X compatible version so I
haven't used it.
I use Photoshop + Camera Raw for everything anyway, after trying all
the available Mac OS X RAW converters I just like what I get from it
more with Canon 10D, KM A2, and Pentax DS RAW files. (I just ordered
I'v never been able to do a very good Raw convertion on BBPro.
I think its more suited to the Canon formats, is it not.?
Dave
> That's what ALL catalog thumbnail programs do, as far as I'm aware.
> Even BreezeBrowser, which is capable of doing RAW conversion, just
> shows you the preview JPEG
On Nov 14, 2005, at 10:04 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I think Thumbs Plus does real RAW previews. I know it does RAW
conversions (even batch conversion) and will display full-size RAW
images. It has its own built-in RAW converter.
Just looked it up. Thumbs Plus Professional Edition v7 can do RAW
Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Jostein wrote on 14.11.05 17:22:
Does iView support raw files?
>>> Yes, but only in "pro" version.
>>
>> And even then, it just displays the RAW f
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jostein wrote on 14.11.05 17:22:
Does iView support raw files?
Yes, but only in "pro" version.
And even then, it just displays the RAW files by showing you the
embedded JPEG. Useful for identif
On Nov 14, 2005, at 8:22 AM, Jostein wrote:
iView does the 'offline' archiving very nicely. They also offer a
free reader for browsing catalog file thumbnails so you can share
catalogs easily without the recipients having to own the iView
program.
Kinda guessed.
iView wasn't available fo
Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Jostein wrote on 14.11.05 17:22:
>
>> Does iView support raw files?
>Yes, but only in "pro" version.
And even then, it just displays the RAW files by showing you the
embedded JPEG. Useful for identifying and cataloging your shots but not
serious eval
Jostein wrote on 14.11.05 17:22:
> Does iView support raw files?
Yes, but only in "pro" version.
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Nov 14, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Jostein wrote:
>
>> When I made the choice, I landed on ThumbsPlus because of the
>> support for "offline" archiving: the ability to retain thumbnails
>> and search criteria for removable media. For all I know, this may b
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
iView does the 'offline' archiving very nicely. They also offer a
free reader for browsing catalog file thumbnails so you can share
catalogs easily without the recipients having to own the iView
program.
Kinda guessed
iView does the 'offline' archiving very nicely. They also offer a
free reader for browsing catalog file thumbnails so you can share
catalogs easily without the recipients having to own the iView program.
Godfrey
On Nov 14, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Jostein wrote:
When I made the choice, I landed on
- Original Message -
From: "keith_w"
Subject: Re: Request for help or advise. The critical mass is achieved...
When I remember, I back my stuff up onto a CD, or more likely a DVD.
I don't catalogue them or anything like that.
I figure it would be the height of arr
Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have 4000+ PEF files, and 3 years worth of film shooting (1 film a
>week or so)... I have to devise a way to catalog the whole darn bunch.
>
>What kind of system/program/solution you use?
>
>I know this has been discussed previously, so I would appreci
I use key words and a date to describe every folder on the hard drives.
On my DVD backups I use dates only in most cases, but I highlight
important files with some key words as well. For each set of backups, I
print a hard copy of the directory.
Paul
On Nov 14, 2005, at 4:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
Hi Boris,
Godfrey mentioned iView. That's one of the serious contenders.
Here's two more:
BreezeBrowser: www.breezebrowser.com
ThumbsPlus: www.cerious.com
When I made the choice, I landed on ThumbsPlus because of the support for
"offline" archiving: the ability to retain thumbnails and search
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Request for help or advise. The critical mass is achieved...
Hi!
I have 4000+ PEF files, and 3 years worth of film shooting (1 film a
week or so)... I have to devise a way to catalog the whole darn bunch.
Wh
On 14/11/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I have 4000+ PEF files, and 3 years worth of film shooting (1 film a
>week or so)... I have to devise a way to catalog the whole darn bunch.
>
>What kind of system/program/solution you use?
>
>I know this has been discussed previously, so
ACDC is an image aviewer + a datbase with a search engine.
I believe Photoshop Elements 3 is too.
All the best.
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. november 2005 05:48
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Reques
I use iView MediaPro (http://www.iview-multimedia.com) to create
catalog files of all photos. My backups and archives now constitute
130,000+ digital image files made over the past decade, a single
catalog file can contain up to 100,000 of them. I generally make one
archive catalog per year
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Request for help or advise. The critical mass is achieved...
Hi!
I have 4000+ PEF files, and 3 years worth of film shooting (1 film a week
or so)... I have to devise a way to catalog the whole darn bunch.
What kind of system/pr
32 matches
Mail list logo
