> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 April 2006 13:08
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part
> 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
>
> Not change # in headline.
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 4. april 2006 14:08
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO:
> Remake - Aristocrat in red)
>
> Not change # in headline.
>
> This is as ugly, ass can be.
> This list _is_ the dark
gt; Sent: 4. april 2006 14:12
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO:
> Remake - Aristocrat in red)
>
> Tim,
>
> I think you meant annals, anals is something else entirely.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> Ti
Tim,
I think you meant annals, anals is something else entirely.
-Adam
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Not change # in headline.
This is as ugly, ass can be.
This list _is_ the dark side ;-)
Seriously. Isn't it "real English" to use anals as short for analects?
My spellchecker says no, but it is very li
Not change # in headline.
This is as ugly, ass can be.
This list _is_ the dark side ;-)
Seriously. Isn't it "real English" to use anals as short for analects?
My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidit
5 matches
Mail list logo
