Re: Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

My film guru tells me the same, but he says that Supra is going to replace Royal Gold. Are they the same film? Seems like it to me. Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Bob wrote: Got some bad news for you...my local guru at Ritz sez ALL Royal Golds are being retired...Kodak has just reduce

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

Hi David ... The answer to all your film storage questions - well, most, anyway - can be found on my site, the address of which is in my sig line. Click on "Storage of Photographic Materials - Kodak" David Brooks wrote: > > If one stocked up on this and keeps it in the > fridge,how long mig

Re: Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

If one stocked up on this and keeps it in the fridge,how long might it stay "fresh" Dave Begin Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:26:47 EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100   Got some bad news for you...my local guru a

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

Got some bad news for you...my local guru at Ritz sez ALL Royal Golds are being retired...Kodak has just reduced $$$ to dump, it so stock-up!! At Ritz (Manchester,N.H.) 4 pk of 24's ASA 200 = $ 7.99 , ASA 400 = $ 9.99 (yes ROYAL gold)

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

Interesting. Pop Photo's film comparison table notes that Kodak's GA, GB and GC films all have "medium high" contrast, and Fuji Superia Reala 100, Superia 200 and 400 have "medium" contrast. (Apparently, Fuji Superia 100 is different in that it has "high" contrast. Go figure.) I wonder how their j

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

- Original Message - From: "Timothy Sherburne" Subject: Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100 > FWIW, ol' Greenspun recommends either 100 or 400 ISO for print films, and to > stay away from 200. The resolving power of 200 and 400 are usually so close > that you might as

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

FWIW, ol' Greenspun recommends either 100 or 400 ISO for print films, and to stay away from 200. The resolving power of 200 and 400 are usually so close that you might as well get the 400 and the extra stop that comes with it. t On 1/4/02 3:07 PM, Lawren

RE: Kodak Royal Gold 100

I don't really think Royal Gold 100 is like Portra; in my opinion, the Portra is more natural, while the RG is a bit more punchy. But so much can depend on the printing, for sure. You might try Fuji Reala 100. It's has very fine grain and rich colors -- if that's what you want. I have complete

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

I was casting about on rec.photo.film+labs a while ago in search of a highly saturated C-41 film for flower season a few months off. Someone posted that Konica Centuria 200 has color saturation nearly equal to Agfa Ultra 50 (now gone). I'm going to try some of it this spring. For that matter, Fuj

RE: Kodak Royal Gold 100

Now this is really bad news. Is there no film replacing this one from Kodak? Do I need to switch to Fuji or buy a lot of stock and freeze it? What Fuji comes close to this one? It was my standard film:-( Frits Wüthrich dick graham wrote: > First Kodak eliminated Royal Gold 25, now RG 100 is to

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

Shel, I was in Barnes & Noble last week looking through the latest Peterson's Photographic annual article reviewing film. Under Royal Gold 100 they stated that it is to be discontinued but is still available at present until stocks run out. My local supermarket, which has always carried plen

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

, 2002 3:07 PM Subject: Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100 > Where/when did you hear about this? > > dick graham wrote: > > > > First Kodak eliminated Royal Gold 25, now RG 100 is to be terminated. > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.earthlin

Re: Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

d the facial features were more noticable. Also were did you that too. Dave Begin Original Message From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:07:38 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100 Shel typed >Where/when did you hear about this

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

dick, I used to use Lots and lots of Portra NC 160, but more recently have been using Fuji Reala 100. I am very happy with the saturation, skin tones, lower contrast and lack of grain. You might give it a go. Perhaps, like me, you will be pleasantly surprised. Bruce Dayton Thursday, Januar

Re: Kodak Royal Gold 100

Where/when did you hear about this? dick graham wrote: > > First Kodak eliminated Royal Gold 25, now RG 100 is to be terminated. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://ww