Hi!
Whatever that is to the bug's right is quite
distracting. I preferred the original composition.
I also prefer the original version.
Boris
On 4/4/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer the first one. Much more striking.
I agree with Mr. Shell.
-frank, who's been way too busy at work these past to days to actually
type a reasoned critique (like I ever...), so I'm just scrolling down
to something that I agree with and, w
On 4/3/06, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Square makes a difference. It makes it square.
Mark!!
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I prefer the first one. Much more striking.
Bob
I like this format better as the uninteresting bottom part of the
previous composition disappeared. With more attention on the strange
form of the flower in the background this picture is even more
fascinating.
Henk
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> From: Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/04 Tue AM 06:31:54 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: PESO - A bug in the field - Take II
>
> Bruce Dayton wrote:
> > I like this one better. The first one, the dew really looked over the
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I like this one better. The first one, the dew really looked over the
top to me - not much like dew. This one seems more natural. I'm not
sure if the square crop matters much, but overall, this is very nice.
There's something not quite right about this picture (and the
I like this one better. The first one, the dew really looked over the
top to me - not much like dew. This one seems more natural. I'm not
sure if the square crop matters much, but overall, this is very nice.
--
Bruce
Monday, April 3, 2006, 5:46:39 PM, you wrote:
KW> Check out
KW> http://my
I do like the alignment better and it's a dazzling image. The "stuff"
protruding from it's head has me somewhat confused as to what is bug
and what is plant, however.
Not quite as clean an image, but very nice.
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check out
> http://mypeoplepc
Square makes a difference. It makes it square.
It is kind of hard to compare not having access to the first. From memory I
prefer the background of the first, less distractions.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely
Ken,
I like the crop and effective enlargement of the dew drops.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/3/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check out
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Slightly different composition, but same bug.
>
> Does Square make a difference?
>
>
Kenneth,
Whatever that is to the bug's right is quite
distracting. I preferred the original composition.
Rick
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check out
>
>
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Slightly different composition, but same bug.
>
> Does
Nice shot. I think I prefer this crop.
Paul
On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:46 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Slightly different composition, but same bug.
Does Square make a difference?
Comments solicited
Good/Bad/Indifferent
What can y
13 matches
Mail list logo
