Re[2]: Kodak Royal Gold 100

> JT> For that matter, Fuji's and Konica's C-41 offerings in ISO 100, 200, and > JT> 400 now all have the same granularity - RMS 4. There's getting to be > JT> less and less reason to shoot ISO 100 in C-41. > > How about bright sunlight with large apertures? > > Bruce Dayton > - Yes, that's a re

Re[2]: Kodak Royal Gold 100

Joseph, >Snip< JT> For that matter, Fuji's and Konica's C-41 offerings in ISO 100, 200, and JT> 400 now all have the same granularity - RMS 4. There's getting to be JT> less and less reason to shoot ISO 100 in C-41. How about bright sunlight with large apertures? Bruce Dayton - This message is

Re[2]: Kodak Royal Gold 100

Frits, I think that you should probably try Fuji Reala 100 and maybe Agfa Optima II 100. I have shot quite a bit of the Supra 100 from Kodak but find it to be a bit too contrasty at times. When it is the right film, it is very nice, but I am finding Fuji Reala to do a great job overall. I even