Aesthetically and ergonomically, there is no contest. The Super A is a
little jewel. The SFx is a great lumbering dynosaur. But they're both
well-made and competent cameras.
John
On Tue, 31 May 2005 13:51:12 +0100, Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW,
I have had the SFXn and it's
Thanks for the information on the Super Program. I'll be looking around
on ebay the next couple of days.
Groeten,
Vic
BTW,
I have had the SFXn and it's a very loud camera. With the AA grip the
grip is very good, but it comes (as does SuperA) from an era when
Pentax tried strange control ergonomics - buttons and such (nearly
everybody did, the worst culprit was Minolta - their cameras from the
early AF era are an
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Sensor in the Super Program is on the side, facing the film,
> although the Super Program doesn't meter off the film normally.
Of all Pentax SLR cameras, only the LX meters non-flash off the film.
All Pentax TTL-flash cameras meter flash off the film/sen
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And to go completely wacky, the MZ-10 is another forgotten gem (it is
> also frequently black, for those who care). Despite the 0 in the end,
> it has full backward compatibility with the K/M lenses.
Indeed, just bought a new old stock from eBa
--- Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked and believe you are correct.
> Sensor in the LX is on the bottom, facing the film.
> Sensor in the Super Program is on the side, facing the film,
> although the Super Program doesn't meter off the film normally.
The sensor inside the mirror bo
Frantisek
I looked and believe you are correct.
Sensor in the LX is on the bottom, facing the film.
Sensor in the Super Program is on the side, facing the film,
although the Super Program doesn't meter off the film normally.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/30/05, Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BS>
On Sun, 29 May 2005, John Forbes wrote:
> Yer pays yer money, and yer takes yer choice. If you don't need
> auto-focus, my choice would be the Super-A.
When comparing the SFXn with the Super-A it's the built-in winder that
makes the difference for me (particularly since he will be using
screw-mo
BS> The TTL flash in the LX measures flash light bouncing off of the film.
BS> The TTL flash in the Super Program measures with a sensor in the
BS> mirror box. The effect is the same, ie. it measures the flash as
BS> actually seen by the camera at the film.
Actually, both work the exact same way
I agree with Kostas that the SF.. bodies are much under-rated and
therefore very good value.
However (having just replaced my old Super A (Super Program) on Ebay for
next to nothing, for purely nostalgic reasons), I have to say that the
Super A is a superbly designed and beautifully small c
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Your only
> problem will be getting a K-bayonet to screwmount adapter for the
> Super Program.
Why?
Kostas
Vic,
I bought the Super Program/Super A new 20+ years ago and was very
pleased with the flash TTL on the camera. It was way ahead of its
time and other brands.
The TTL flash in the LX measures flash light bouncing off of the film.
The TTL flash in the Super Program measures with a sensor in the
I have a SuperA/SuperProgram for sale.
I also have the MotorA which offers a nice grip, vertical shutter
button and and 3 fps speed.
It does of course TTL.
PLease contact me offlist if interested.
Regards,
--
Thibouille
--
Z1,SuperA,KX,MX,P30t and KR-10x ..
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Vic Mortelmans wrote:
> I've been reading this forum for a couple of weeks. I've come across it
Welcome!
> - are the flash units for the Super Program still easy to find?
Yes, very. Your options are listed in
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/flashes/TTL/index.html
> - are they the
Hello,
I've been reading this forum for a couple of weeks. I've come across it
because I'm using Pentax camera's as a hobby-photographer. I own a
Spotmatic F and an ES and a large number of M42 thread lenses, mostly
from the Super-Multi-Coated series.
At this moment (but these perceptions ty
15 matches
Mail list logo