Jerry,
Sorry.
I was too busy to clear my mail box. It is now open again.
With all the best.
Sung
> Jeff, List:
>
> (Sung-note message to you below)
>
> Your comment is timely as we begin to enter the next session.
>
> The question of HOW MANY MEANINGS? may be assigned to a sign is critical
Franklin, Ive just got back to this post (and your even longer one that
followed) because I was immersed in the train of thought I posted today
under the subject line What kind of sign is a gene? which is, I think
youll agree, relevant to your questions that Ive been appearing to ignore.
I d
Lists,
Continuing my earlier post to the biosemiotics list, here’s a very condensed
summary of the semiotic ideas I consider most relevant to the question in the
subject line.
The kind of sign that is complete enough to convey information is traditionally
called a proposition. A verbal p
Jeff, List:
(Sung-note message to you below)
Your comment is timely as we begin to enter the next session.
The question of HOW MANY MEANINGS? may be assigned to a sign is critical from
the perspective of trans-disciplinarity. Recall Vinicius's listing of the
several meanings of the term "symb
Post : Peirce's 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 10.5
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/04/06/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-%e2%80%a2-comment-10-5/
Posted : April 6, 2014 at 2:30 pm
Peircers,
Some of what Peirce says in CP 3.73 has me scratching my head. And not for the first time, of
Sorry, mistaken citation, should have been "CP 6.222" not "CP 6.22".
Corrected below. - Best, Ben
On 4/6/2014 12:50 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
[] He discusses vividness in:
CP 7.494-7,
CP 1.305 ("*Feeling as Independent of Mind and Change*"),
CP 8.30 (where he says that experience is more
Dear Peirceans,
some of you may remember the MGS (Meaning Generator
System) where a system submitted to an internal constraint generates a meaning
to satisfy the constraint.
Such meaning generation process is close to the Peircean Interpreter
(see ‘Information and Meaning’ in Peirce-l:
http:/
