Matthew O. Persico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:48:11 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
>[snip]
>>The project page is at http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/. �Please take a
>>look, tell me your thoughts, and if there are any serious ommissions
>>from the Phalanx 100 module list...
>
>Tk?
If
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:48:11 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> The project page is at http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/. Please take a
> look, tell me your thoughts, and if there are any serious ommissions
> from the Phalanx 100 module list...
Test::Reporter?
--
Adam J. Foxson
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:48:11 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
[snip]
>The project page is at http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/. Please take a
>look, tell me your thoughts, and if there are any serious ommissions
>from the Phalanx 100 module list...
Tk?
--
Matthew O. Persico
Hi,
I just start smoke on this "top100" with cpanplus.
Why, as you display docs, bugs and rating, you didn't display link to
cpan testers results ?
Regards,
--
Alain BARBET
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:08:51AM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> >If we do, then it won't be the Phalanx 100 anymore, will it. :)
> >I'd highly recommend against a naming scheme that limits your
> >implementation.
> >Hard coded constants and all that. :)
>
> How does it limit my implementation? Do
When will all of this phalanxing start? I'm excited about it and I can't
wait to get my hands dirty. Hopefully with school and all I will have time
to help you guys out.
BTW
phalanxing - the action of testing and improving CPAN and Perl. (or
something to that effect)
:-p
~~Andrew
> -Or
On Friday 22 August 2003 15:08, Andy Lester wrote:
> Core modules are phase two because of the Extra Excitement that will
> be caused by mucking with them and pumpking coordination and whatnot.
None of the phalanx 100 depend on any core modules? Or you just plan to deal
with the bare minimum of c
I'll be interested to see how you handle non-Perl dependencies as in
C libraries.
Yeah, me too! :-)
If we do, then it won't be the Phalanx 100 anymore, will it. :)
I'd highly recommend against a naming scheme that limits your implementation.
Hard coded constants and all that. :)
How does it limit
> Net_SSLeay.pm
Just noticed that's a kinda odd name for a distribution that contains
the modules Net::SSLeay and Net::SSLeay::Handle. I wonder why is it
not called Net-SSLeay?
/-\
http://search.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Search
- Looking for more? Try the new Yahoo! Search
Hi!
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:48:11PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> The Phalanx project has started its rampup to an official
> announcement. Phalanx is going to beef up the tests, coverage and
> docs on Perl and 100 heavily-used modules from CPAN.
Have you got an plans on combining Phalanx and
On Fri 22 Aug 2003 11:16, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:48:11PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> > The Phalanx project has started its rampup to an official
> > announcement. Phalanx is going to beef up the tests, coverage and
> > docs on Perl and 100 heavi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:48:11PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> The Phalanx project has started its rampup to an official
> announcement. Phalanx is going to beef up the tests, coverage and
> docs on Perl and 100 heavily-used modules from CPAN.
I'll be interested to see how you handle non-Perl d
Andy Lester wrote:
> The Phalanx project has started its rampup to an official
> announcement. Phalanx is going to beef up the tests, coverage and
> docs on Perl and 100 heavily-used modules from CPAN.
>
> The project page is at http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/. Please take a
> look, tell me your
13 matches
Mail list logo
