2010/1/3 Eric Wilhelm
> >>>add one more level and make
> >> > the tab be "History", then history.html is a page which says " >> > href="phalanx">Phalanx 100 started in 2003..."
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps somebody would like to put together a more comprehensive
> >> > QA timeline including the developm
# from Leo Lapworth
# on Saturday 02 January 2010 10:57:
>I've renamed to 'inactive' for now.
>
>I like Eric's idea about history if someone wants to create that.
>
>>>add one more level and make
>> > the tab be "History", then history.html is a page which says "> > href="phalanx">Phalanx 100 star
--- On Sat, 2/1/10, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> From: Leo Lapworth
> I've renamed to 'inactive' for now.
>
> I like Eric's idea about history if someone wants to create
> that.
I'll second that. From a pure marketing perspective, "archive", "inactive" and
"old" all imply "dead". "History" implies
I've renamed to 'inactive' for now.
I like Eric's idea about history if someone wants to create that.
Cheers
Leo
2010/1/2 Shaun Fryer
> How about "inactive" rather than archive or old.
> --
> Shaun Fryer
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>
> > # from Leo Lapworth
> >
How about "inactive" rather than archive or old.
--
Shaun Fryer
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Leo Lapworth
> # on Saturday 02 January 2010 08:35:
>
> >I've renamed Old to Archive, but you've not actually told me what
> > would be best for the other stuff.
>
> "Arc
# from Leo Lapworth
# on Saturday 02 January 2010 08:35:
>I've renamed Old to Archive, but you've not actually told me what
> would be best for the other stuff.
"Archive" still implies "Old". Why not take the tab out of the
navigation bar entirely? Or, at least add one more level and make the
I missed this - apologies.
Now uploaded.
Cheers
Leo
2010/1/2 David Golden
> For the record, I'll second Barbie's suggestion.
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Barbie wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:10:48PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Le
Hi,
2010/1/2 Salve J Nilsen
> A few comments,
>
Thanks.
> Leo Lapworth said:
>
>> 2010/1/2 James E Keenan
>>
>> 3) Phalanx
>>
>> Though in one sense it pains me to say it, Phalanx does not need to be a
>>> major tab. It can be demoted to a link somewhere.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I have put it
For the record, I'll second Barbie's suggestion.
David
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Barbie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:10:48PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Leo Lapworth wrote:
>> > 2) Testing CPAN
>> >
>> > Shaun, would you mind looking at this?
>>
nto
something more useful than the "mission statement/overview" type page
we have now, then this would be it. :)
But, to the best of my knowledge, there's no active Phalanx project
per se at the present time. So it doesn't need to be quite so
prominent on qa.perl.org
ke people
want to join/help instead of demoting the page to "historical value
only"?
3) What context is the most useful one to promote a project within?
("Finished"? "Current projects"? "Community efforts"?)
I suggest that the qa.perl.org front
Please note this is cross posted.
2010/1/2 James E Keenan
> Leo Lapworth wrote:
3) Phalanx
>>
>
> Though in one sense it pains me to say it, Phalanx does not need to be a
> major tab. It can be demoted to a link somewhere.
I have put it is as a tab on the right called 'old projects'.
I re
Leo Lapworth wrote:
Hi,
Please note this is cross posted.
Several of the QA people have kindly said they will help with updating
http://qa.perl.org/.
3) Phalanx
Though in one sense it pains me to say it, Phalanx does not need to be a
major tab. It can be demoted to a link somewhere
> 1) Testing your code - I think this will need the largest amount of work.
>
> Hilary, could I ask you to have a look at this?
>
> - Are the articles the best we can link to?
> - Do we need those articles if we update the rest of the content.
> - can the test-modules.html and testing-guidelines.
> 1) Testing your code - I think this will need the largest amount of work.
>
> Hilary, could I ask you to have a look at this?
>
> - Are the articles the best we can link to?
> - Do we need those articles if we update the rest of the content.
> - can the test-modules.html and testing-guidelines.
Should have hit reply all!
I've applied most of this patch.
2009/12/30 Leo Lapworth
> 2009/12/30 Shlomi Fish
>
>> On Wednesday 30 Dec 2009 10:50:35 Shlomi Fish wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2009 23:54:26 Leo Lapworth wrote:
>> > > 3) Phalanx
>> > >
>> > > Shlomi, would you look at this?
>> > >
On Wednesday 30 Dec 2009 10:50:35 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2009 23:54:26 Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please note this is cross posted.
> >
> > Several of the QA people have kindly said they will help with updating
> > http://qa.perl.org/
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:10:48PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > 2) Testing CPAN
> >
> > Shaun, would you mind looking at this?
> >
> > - Just needs a quick review/update
>
> The CPAN Testers stuff looks fine to me. The Daily Build section
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2009 23:54:26 Leo Lapworth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please note this is cross posted.
>
> Several of the QA people have kindly said they will help with updating
> http://qa.perl.org/.
>
> I'm cross posting to
> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/m
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> 2) Testing CPAN
>
> Shaun, would you mind looking at this?
>
> - Just needs a quick review/update
The CPAN Testers stuff looks fine to me. The Daily Build section
should really go to a new tab "Testing Perl" or "Testing Perl Source"
or "Tes
Hi,
Please note this is cross posted.
Several of the QA people have kindly said they will help with updating
http://qa.perl.org/.
I'm cross posting to
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/perl-org-patches
I've split out the site a bit more, so there is a 'testing y
On Saturday 19 Dec 2009 14:54:42 Leo Lapworth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cleaned up http://qa.perl.org/ but the content needs a complete
> review/update.
>
> Is anyone interested in doing this?
>
I am!
You can contact me here:
http://www.shlomifish.org/me/contact-me/
Regards,
2009/12/20 Salve J Nilsen
> Hi, Leo! Welcome to perl-qa! :)
Thanks
Sweet. But does ALL of it need an update? If not, which parts are you
> specifically thinking of?
Probably not all of it.
> Is anyone interested in doing this?
>
>
Wow lots of you are, Thanks Hilary and Shaun as well - coo
Hi, Leo! Welcome to perl-qa! :)
Leo Lapworth said:
Hi,
I cleaned up http://qa.perl.org/ but the content needs a complete
review/update.
Sweet. But does ALL of it need an update? If not, which parts are you
specifically thinking of?
Is anyone interested in doing this?
Ask me in
Hi,
I cleaned up http://qa.perl.org/ but the content needs a complete
review/update.
Is anyone interested in doing this?
I've chatted with several people, but so far not found anyone interested.
If no one is interested we'll shut down the site as a lot has changed and we
now have CP
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 13:15, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> Kwalitee are precise metrics which strive to approximate quality. The
> name is intentionally different to convey that Kwalitee is related to
> "quality", but not quite the real thing. That's because we don't know
> exactly what quality
On 2005-07-09, Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html says:
>
> What is kwalitee?
>
> Kwalitee is inexact quality. We don't know exactly what it is,
> but we know it when we see it.
>
> Isn't t
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html says:
What is kwalitee?
Kwalitee is inexact quality. We don't know exactly what it is,
but we know it when we see it.
Isn't that backwards? I thought 'kwalitee' was supposed to be a metric
that was exact, and that
--- Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Patches, please. s/html$/pod/ in the URL for the source.
Sorry. I should have gotten these out sooner. I was sidetracked.
I've attached patches to add Test::MockModule to the module list and to
add the "use_ok() or die" wording to the testing gui
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 10:01:44AM -0800, Ovid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I would add Test::MockModule to the test modules. I've stopped using
> my Sub::Override since I encountered this very useful tool.
>
> On the test guidelines, perhaps there should be an "or die "
> recommendation after "u
id
--- Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://qa.perl.org/testing-guidelines.html is updated. So is
> http://qa.perl.org/test-modules.html, with new modules and some
> reorganization.
>
> xoxo,
> Andy
>
>
> --
> Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTEC
http://qa.perl.org/testing-guidelines.html is updated. So is
http://qa.perl.org/test-modules.html, with new modules and some
reorganization.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
There are a couple of minor tweaks to qa.perl.org. Soon, I'll have a
page up for the Phalanx project and THEN we'll have ourselves a good
time!
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:24:47AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>
> Getting the word out about the various projects is something we
> need, so I made
>
> http://qa.perl.org/
>
> Schwern, I need some comments from you. :-)
Ummm, perl-qa-metrics is a mailing list
Getting the word out about the various projects is something we
need, so I made
http://qa.perl.org/
Schwern, I need some comments from you. :-)
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
35 matches
Mail list logo
