--- Original Message ---
From:"H.M. Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:02:10 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Parrot Smoke Nov 29 20:00:01 2001 UTC hpux 11.00
Automated smoke report for patch Nov 29 20:00:01 2001
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 18:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hey,
>
> I'm trying to set up tinderbox here for parrot on two systems (sun5.6 and omvs
> (open edition os/390))
>
> Unfortunately, I can't see to port 2401 in the outside world because of
> firewall (to do the continuous checkout from cvs
concat, set, {add,sub,mul,div} implemented.
The following instructions will now work as in perl5...
set P0,3
set P1,"foo"
concat P0,P0,P1 # "3foo"
set P0,3
add P0,P0,P1 # 3
set P0,-13.3
set P1,"13.3"
add P0,P0,P1 # 0 (even though P1 is a string)
The code for add/sub/mul/div has to be able to be
Jeff G wrote:
>
> Shouldn't we be placing set_p_i and the like in vtable.ops?
Of course, I meant vtable.tbl... Based on this confusion I'm now
wondering if it wouldn't be better to let a human create the vtable.ops
file and leave vtable.tbl as an auxiliary file that's used to generate
the approp
Shouldn't we be placing set_p_i and the like in vtable.ops?
-Jeff
Radio Shack: You've got questions, we've got blank stares!
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Brent Dax wrote:
> Alex Gough:
> # I've managed to get parrot building and testing nicely on an os/2 box
> # (thanks to Nick Burch). At the moment it needs gcc, make, bash and
> # dynaloading libraries installed on the system.
>
> # $c{iv} = "long";
> # $c{nv} = "double";
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:04:13AM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:50:24PM -0500, James Mastros wrote:
> > > Why? For at least x86, your way will be a lot slower.
> >
> > Maybe I should try to find out why Perl 5 does it like
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:50:24PM -0500, James Mastros wrote:
> Why? For at least x86, your way will be a lot slower.
Maybe I should try to find out why Perl 5 does it like that before making
such pronouncements. :)
Nick, any idea why Perl's abs doesn't use abs?
Simon
--
The primary differe
Alex Gough:
# I've managed to get parrot building and testing nicely on an os/2 box
# (thanks to Nick Burch). At the moment it needs gcc, make, bash and
# dynaloading libraries installed on the system.
# $c{iv} = "long";
# $c{nv} = "double";
# $c{opcode_t}="long";
Are these actually neces
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:41:36PM +, Alex Gough wrote:
> I'd prefer you did it the way Perl does it - if (foo < 0) foo = -foo;
Why? For at least x86, your way will be a lot slower.
-=- James Mastros
--
Put bin Laden out like a bad cigar:
I'm thinking of pushing it out this time next week, if we're building
happily everywhere and I'm happy with what scalars can do. Oh,
we'll need a PerlUndef class first, but that should be relatively
trivial to implement.
I'd really, really like more tests for scalar behaviour. Also, how
far off
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:41:36PM +, Alex Gough wrote:
> I'd like some abs ops so I can make the fp tests better, does
> the attached patch do the right thing? I'll commit tomorrow if
> no one complains.
I'd prefer you did it the way Perl does it - if (foo < 0) foo = -foo;
--
"Life sucks,
I'd like some abs ops so I can make the fp tests better, does
the attached patch do the right thing? I'll commit tomorrow if
no one complains.
Alex Gough
--
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~shug0957/
Index: core.ops
===
RCS file: /home/p
I've managed to get parrot building and testing nicely on an os/2 box
(thanks to Nick Burch). At the moment it needs gcc, make, bash and
dynaloading libraries installed on the system.
Alex Gough
--
And if we tamper with our inheritance, so what? What is more ours to
tamper with? What makes nat
hey,
I'm trying to set up tinderbox here for parrot on two systems (sun5.6 and omvs
(open edition os/390))
Unfortunately, I can't see to port 2401 in the outside world because of
firewall (to do the continuous checkout from cvs)... any plans to set up
a pserver on a regular port (say, 80) that
--- Original Message ---
From:"H.M. Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:03:45 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Parrot Smoke Nov 28 20:00:02 2001 UTC hpux 11.00
Automated smoke report for patch Nov 28 20:00:02 2001
16 matches
Mail list logo
