> Sorry for a slightly off-topic post, but will Larry's State of the Onion
> be posted online soon?
Yes.
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/talks/
-R
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since parrot currently can't compile on Solaris due to the absense of
>> setenv/unsetenv in the Solaris libc, I've added tests for the
>> functions, as well as a putenv-based implementation.
>
> Should
Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> =_1058035003-24323-0
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Disposition: inline
> # New Ticket Created by Lars Balker Rasmussen
> # Please include the string: [perl #22925]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about thi
# New Ticket Created by Lars Balker Rasmussen
# Please include the string: [perl #22925]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22925 >
Since parrot currently can't compile on Solaris due to the absense of
setenv/un
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:09 AM +0200 7/11/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> > pmclass Env extends default {
>>
>>What do you think of:
>>- Env extends PerlHash
> Thought about it, but I couldn't think of a reason why.
%ENV{'something'), keys(%ENV), iterating over %ENV ...
Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ patch ]
Applied. Thanks.
leo
Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> OTOH, if there is a clear need for an e.g. NumStr hybrid, then it
>> should be a separate PMC which is used, when $HL says so by some
>> traits.
> There is indeed a clear need for it -- the values produced by $! (and by
> the
Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ patch ]
Applied. Thanks.
leo
Gregor N. Purdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin --
> #define DO_OP(PC,INTERP) \
> (PC = ((INTERP->op_func_table)[*PC])(PC,INTERP))
> The easiest way to intercept this flow with minimal cost is to
> have the mechanism that wants to take over replace the interpreter's
> op_func_table with
Graciliano M . P . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Parrot compiles fine, but when I try to compile languages, specially /languages/imcc
> I can't!
> What I need to do?
Post error message(s).
> Regards,
> GMP.
leo
Steve Fink wrote:
I didn't have the opportunity then, but I'm really wondering -- what
about this did NMAKE dislike? I still prefer the rebuild.pl method,
but I don't have nmake, so I can't beat it into submission.
The problem was, that the change dates of the dependend files are not
controllable
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 04:13:07PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> On Sunday 13 July 2003 15:53, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > The way I deal with this is to make a module that does all the heavy
> > lifting, give it an appropriate import sub, and then a test reduces to
> > something like:
> >
> > use Tes
On Sunday 13 July 2003 15:53, Paul Johnson wrote:
> The way I deal with this is to make a module that does all the heavy
> lifting, give it an appropriate import sub, and then a test reduces to
> something like:
>
> use TestX ( opt1 => "x", opt2 => "y" )
>
> That covers everything except the pe
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:22:43PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> Hi,
> is it possible with Test::Harness and MakeMaker to pass arguments to my test
> scripts? I think it's not but I just want to check for sure. The module I'm
> working on is getting a new "optimised" mode so I'd like to be able to ru
Hi,
is it possible with Test::Harness and MakeMaker to pass arguments to my test
scripts? I think it's not but I just want to check for sure. The module I'm
working on is getting a new "optimised" mode so I'd like to be able to run
all the tests twice, once with and once without the opti
15 matches
Mail list logo
