On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:07:29AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: > I like $-, $+, and $? the best. Probably should save $- and $+ for something
: > complimentary, which leaves $?. It's visually distinctive, and recently
: > came
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 01:40:47PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Larry Wall writes:
: > I like $-, $+, and $? the best. Probably should save $- and $+ for something
: > complimentary, which leaves $?. It's visually distinctive, and recently
: > came available. :-)
:
: Hmm, $& is pretty good, and
Thanks, (belatedly) applied, along with a MANIFEST patch.
(Minus the python/README, which appears to have magically appeared sometime in the
past
six months! =-)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Mar 01 16:58:08 2004]:
>
> This patch creates a couple of new small README's, for several
> languages/ di
On Sep 16, 2004, at 2:47 PM, Tels wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Thursday 16 September 2004 23:37, Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi paul :)
I think this has come up before, but I'm not sure what the resolution
was.
I just came across (production) code that looks like this:
return 1 if
>>> return 1 if $one == $two or return 0;
>
>
> Just FYI:
>
> I always wonder why someone would write such code. IMHO this is
> unmaintainable code. I might not be an Perl expert, but I wouldn't consider
> myself a beginner either, especially not at boolean logic. And still, my
> mind canno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Thursday 16 September 2004 23:37, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> hi paul :)
>
> I think this has come up before, but I'm not sure what the resolution
> was.
>
> I just came across (production) code that looks like this:
>
> return 1 if $one == $two or return
hi paul :)
I think this has come up before, but I'm not sure what the resolution was.
I just came across (production) code that looks like this:
return 1 if $one == $two or return 0;
in the condition coverage the second return is always false, but I suppose
that it could be argued that if the
On Thursday 16 September 2004 22:17, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
> # Please include the string: [perl #31606]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31606 >
>
>
> Hi
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #31607]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31607 >
Leo says:
>The docs aren't yet updated, sorry. Have a look at t/pmc/nci.t for example
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #31606]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31606 >
Hi,
so far external libraries can pass integers and strings to Parrot callba
Larry Wall writes:
> I like $-, $+, and $? the best. Probably should save $- and $+ for something
> complimentary, which leaves $?. It's visually distinctive, and recently
> came available. :-)
Hmm, $& is pretty good, and it's associated with subs mnemonically, just
as $= is associated with lin
- Original Message -
From: Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 16, 2004 2:55 pm
Subject: Re: Still about subroutines...
> Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2004-09-16 13:44 (-0500):
> > Speaking of which ... why is it that $?foo and became
> $<>> and <> respectively?
>
> per
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2004-09-16 13:44 (-0500):
> Speaking of which ... why is it that $?foo and became $<>
> and <> respectively?
perlcheat is one page. I hope that when Perl 6 is around, I can
summarize all uses of << and >> on one page. The second page will be for
the rest of the synta
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:07:29AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> I like $-, $+, and $? the best. Probably should save $- and $+ for something
> complimentary, which leaves $?. It's visually distinctive, and recently
> came available. :-)
Speaking of which ... why is it that $?foo and became $<>
a
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:02:18AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: The new alternative is MY.sub. I suppose that could return the current
: actual sub, so if you're using a pointy sub you have to say MY.block or
: something. But it's one of those two.
Or something resembling them. I'm still pining
Michele Dondi writes:
> Speaking of subs, and especially recursive ones which have been
> mentioned en passant earlier, I have another question "of mine": I
> know that in the vast majority of cases this won't be useful in any
> way, but in the body of a (possibly anonymous) sub/block, will there
>
Speaking of subs, and especially recursive ones which have been mentioned
en passant earlier, I have another question "of mine": I know that in the
vast majority of cases this won't be useful in any way, but in the body of
a (possibly anonymous) sub/block, will there be some sort of identifier to
# New Ticket Created by Jens Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #31600]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31600 >
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.6.4
arch= i586-linux-thread-multi
cc= cc
---
Flags:
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Grammar roles?
>
> Larry
Hmm, actually a few questions on the topic:
S5 doesn't specify whether grammars can have attributes. Can they? Can
they have methods, or at least local subs, to call from the code within
the rules?
Can gramma
# New Ticket Created by Jens Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #31601]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31601 >
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.6.4
arch= i586-linux-thread-multi
cc= cc
---
Flags:
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 14:56, StÃphane Payrard wrote:
> Updated doc and some code to reflect new Parrot_new() interface
Thanks, applied.
(Even though src/test_main.c is no longer used.)
jens
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 06:42, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> When I try to run one of the SDL examples (any of them), I get:
>
> SDL::fetch_layout warning: layout 'Pixels' not found!
> Segmentation fault
>
> When I edit runtime/parrot/library/SDL.imc and add the call to
> _set_Pixels_layout in at l
> Okay, it ought to be there soon. I added it in the "New operators"
> section, since it's pretty different from =~.
That'd also be appropriate, but I didn't see an explicit mention anywhere...
> Arguably the ~~ table should go in S3 instead of S4.
It most likely should, since ~~ is an operator,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| -- Original Message --
| From: Charles Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The whole reason I'm fooling around with nci in the first place is to
| register callbacks as described in pdd16, and it was the function
| signature of 'vCYZ' that was failing.
The docs aren't yet up
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 23:58, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
> I'm not sure this is a panic-worthy error--panics are really meant for
> cases where something has gone horribly, unfixably wrong in the
> interpreter's guts, like a critical pointer in the ParrotInterp got
> nulled out, or som
On Wednesday 15 September 2004, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
> # Please include the string: [perl #31590]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31590 >
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Larry Wall wrote:
> : So what I would like to do is (i) C the list of templates to a list
> : of curried closures in which the first parameter is fixed to each given
> : template, (ii) C this list by means of right pipe binop
> : ( C<< ==> >> ) with a "starting value" (leftm
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Michele Dondi wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Matt Diephouse wrote:
>
> > Or in Perl 5, which has to use 2 subs to have the same interface (code
^^^
^^^
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Matt Diephouse wrote:
> Or in Perl 5, which has to use 2 subs to have the same interface (code
^
^
Huh?!?
#!/usr/bin/perl -l
use strict;
use warnings;
sub extp ($@) {
my $t=shift;
| -- Original Message --
| From: Charles Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The whole reason I'm fooling around with nci in the first place is to
| register callbacks as described in pdd16, and it was the function
| signature of 'vCYZ' that was failing.
The docs aren't yet updated, sorry. Have a loo
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #31594]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31594 >
http://parrotcode.org should have a link (somewhere) to
http://planet.parrotcode.o
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It now prints an error message:
with nothing
with int 5
Parrot VM: PANIC: vt is an unknown signature type.
CAN_BUILD_CALL_FRAMES is disabled, add the signature to src/call_list.txt!
C file src/nci.c, line 4485
Parrot file (unk
32 matches
Mail list logo
