I find it highly amusing that Warnock's patch to update Warnock's contact
information was
Warnocked since April of last year.
I will put him out of his misery, though.
I can only hope that the new email address isn't defunct already. =-)
Thanks, applied!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Apr 08 14:02
Thanks, applied.
(Note: this patch had already been partially applied.)
> [bernhard - Sun Nov 07 05:17:56 2004]:
>
> Hi,
>
> this patch updates 'perlhist.txt', which is used as a test case in
> 't/library/streams.t'.
> 't/library/streams.t' now also uses the new one-line '.return () ' and
> '.y
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> What is unclear about: "This just moves the burden of doing a method
>> call down to all classes and doesn't really fix anything."?
> First you state "The "f" object (the method call stub) has to
> shift up call arguments and place t
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about that - I converted the test from an existing one for
> ResizableFloatArray, but forgot that in the string case there's a
> much higher load on the GC system due to all the string headers.
Actually the problem aren't the string headers per s
Austin~
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 11:20:25 -0500, Austin Hastings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> >Perl 6 Summary for 2004-12-20 through 2005-01-03
> >
> >
> >
>
> s/conses/consensus/g ?
Indeed. Let this be a lesson to anyone who would claim that just
running spell check is enoug
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:31:37PM -0800, Ashley Winters wrote:
: On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:31:47 -0700, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Ashley Winters writes:
: > > sub foo (Class $who) {
: > > my $thing := $who<$var>;
: > > my &func := $who<&func>; # how would I do this otherwise
--- Jon Ericson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > s/conses/consensus/g ?
>
> I assumed it was a Lisp reference. ;-)
contheth?
(No, I'm not really *quite* that clueless.)
Cheers,
Ovid
=
Silence is Evil
http://users.easystreet.com/ov
Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> s/conses/consensus/g ?
I assumed it was a Lisp reference. ;-)
Jon
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
How should the following be handled:
f = "parrot".index
The CPython code is:
1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 ('parrot')
3 LOAD_ATTR0 (index)
6 STORE_NAME
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:29:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please let me know if I'm being too dense or too, er, flippant here, I've
No, you seem to be spot on.
> The 2.7 doesn't have Sun's cc/CC (too expensive) and so
> (config/init/hints/solaris.pl):
> my $link = Configure::Data->g
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How should the following be handled:
>>f = "parrot".index
> The CPython code is:
> 1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 ('parrot')
> 3 LOAD_ATTR0 (index)
> 6
Matt Fowles wrote:
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-12-20 through 2005-01-03
s/conses/consensus/g ?
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote:
>
> > +output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', 'pop many values');
> > + new P0, .ResizableStringArray
> > + set I0, 0
> > +L1: set S0, I0
> > + set P0[I0], S0
> > + inc
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> How should the following be handled:
>f = "parrot".index
The CPython code is:
1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 ('parrot')
3 LOAD_ATTR0 (index)
6 STORE_NAME 1 (f
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ramblings on creating a new VTABLE_call_method "slot" to help with
implementing Python's bound vs unbound methods:
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2005/01/03/Bound-Methods
1) Methods are functions, where the first parameter is the object.
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote:
>> + lt I0, 10, L1
> ^this^
> really really hurts.
It's already reduced in CVS.
> Nicholas Clark
leo
Ian Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pardon me if this is the wrong list for this question.
No, you are quite right here.
> I'm attempting to build parrot-0.1.1.
Parrot is evolving quickly. You might consider to use the CVS version.
> t/pmc/nci..NOK 5# Failed test (t/p
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) When we resize a Resizable*Array (where * = Integer, Float or String)
> by calling set_integer_native, we also set the PMC's active_destroy
> flag. However, we don't do this when resizing a ResizablePMCArray
> (which also has a different memory allo
Peter Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
> Is there a reason that `op pop_pad(out PMC)' has not been
> implemented yet? (It's in ops/var.ops). If so, could someone give me a
> quick heads up as to that reason.
Forgotton? Anyway, it's in. Tests welcome.
> Pete
leo
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote:
> +output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', 'pop many values');
> + new P0, .ResizableStringArray
> + set I0, 0
> +L1: set S0, I0
> + set P0[I0], S0
> + inc I0
> + lt I0, 10, L1
^this^
re
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ramblings on creating a new VTABLE_call_method "slot" to help with
> implementing Python's bound vs unbound methods:
> http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2005/01/03/Bound-Methods
1) Methods are functions, where the first parameter is the object.
We are current
21 matches
Mail list logo
