Re: [perl #36197] [PATCH] make install fails with MinGW32

2005-10-16 Thread François PERRAD
At 21:09 04/10/2005 -0700, you wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Jun 06 23:49:58 2005]: > > > The following problem is the same that in [perl #35388], > so the patch for root.in tries to generalize the solution. > > $ make install > Invoking Parrot to generate install_config.fpmc >

Re: skippable arguments in for loops

2005-10-16 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:21:40AM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote: > Luke Palmer wrote: > > >Joked? Every other language that has pattern matching signatures that > >I know of (that is, ML family and Prolog) uses _. Why should we break > >that? IMO, it's immediately obvious what it means. > > > >Somet

Re: [perl #37303] [PATCH] Relaxing parrot dependency on parrot_config

2005-10-16 Thread Nick Glencross
Here's an updated version of a patch to change how parrot picks up its built-in configuration values. They are currently picked up by the parrot library through globals linked against the executable. This patch changes the API so that the parrot environment starts without a config (which makes

Re: libgdbm and Darwin...

2005-10-16 Thread Alberto Simões
Always the last one. For each test, the get_path is called twice and in both cases the third printf is the one called. Cheers Alberto Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote: Alberto Simões schrieb: It's me again. Linked with gdbm (compiled with fink) and got these errors. They are kind weird because t

Re: Failing make on Darwin...

2005-10-16 Thread Jonathan Worthington
"Alberto Simões" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The make: [...] ../../parrot mklib.pir >PGE/Library.pir make[1]: *** [PGE.pbc] Error 138 make: *** [compilers.dummy] Error 2 Fixed before the message hit the mailing list. ;-) Thanks again, Jonathan

Re: libgdbm and Darwin...

2005-10-16 Thread Alberto Simões
gdbmhash.pmc class_init is being called more than once... first time the load fails, second time it fails... and is not called any more. Something very weird around :) Alberto Simões wrote: It's me again. Linked with gdbm (compiled with fink) and got these errors. They are kind weird because

eval_12.pir failure on HP-UX

2005-10-16 Thread Nick Glencross
eval_12.pir is one of the few tests which are failing on HP-UX. It writes some bytecode to a file and executes it, and then does it again with a slight variation. Running the test gives: # ./parrot t/pmc/eval_12.pir hello from foo_1 Parrot VM: Can't mmap file /var/tmp/build/src/parrot_hpux/./t

Failing make on Darwin...

2005-10-16 Thread Alberto Simões
The make: [...] ../../parrot mklib.pir >PGE/Library.pir make[1]: *** [PGE.pbc] Error 138 make: *** [compilers.dummy] Error 2 Debugging a little: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pge]$ ../../parrot mklib.pir > PGE/Library.pir Bus error [EMAIL PROTECTED] pge]$ gdb ../../parrot GNU gdb 6.1-20040303 (Apple versi

Re: Translitteration and combining strings and array references

2005-10-16 Thread David Formosa \(aka ? the Platypus\)
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:38:55 +0200, Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yesterday I spend some hours getting pugs to understand > translitterations with multiple ranges in each pair. E.g. > > "foobar".trans( "a-z" => "n-za-n" ); > > By accident I tested something like: > > "foobar".t

Re: Copyrights in file headers

2005-10-16 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 02:21:38PM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote: > Hi, > > I keep running accros files that at the top of the file say they are > copyrighted to individual people, then adding stuff to the code as surely > many others have. Am I right in thinking that everything is supposed

Re: libgdbm and Darwin...

2005-10-16 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
Alberto Simões schrieb: It's me again. Linked with gdbm (compiled with fink) and got these errors. They are kind weird because they complain about not being able to load the library, but the tests run correctly. If they run correctly without loading the library one of two things happens: 1

Copyrights in file headers

2005-10-16 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Hi, I keep running accros files that at the top of the file say they are copyrighted to individual people, then adding stuff to the code as surely many others have. Am I right in thinking that everything is supposed to be "Copyright The Perl Foundation"? This is what I've done with any new f