On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:43, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> I was suggesting the functionality be added to Test::More as compile_ok(),
> rather than runperl() in some separate CPAN module, as it seems to closely
> parallel use_ok() for modules and would be rather useful on a larger scale.
That woul
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was suggesting the functionality be added to Test::More as compile_ok(),
> rather than runperl() in some separate CPAN module, as it seems to closely
> parallel use_ok() for modules and would be rather useful on a larger scale.
I agree, a well
>>> I've long intended to take t/test.pl from the Perl core distribution
>>> and wrap
>>> up at least its runperl() in a Test:: module. Perhaps that would
>>> work for
>>> you?
>>
>>
>> compile_ok() ?
>>
>> --Geoff
>>
>
> It is unclear from Geoff's message above whether he is asserting that
>
* Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-15 17:45]:
>Wow. Thanx! (And I have used vim for years...)
I hope the fabled “Vim for vimmers” tutorial gets written one
day. (It was supposed to be a guide to vim’s advanced features
for people who have been using vim for years but have stuck with
the basics.)
http://search.cpan.org/src/ADAMK/ThreatNet-Bot-AmmoBot-0.10/t/01_compile.t
That function should probably be changed to use FindBin instead of
updir() calls.
Actually, by modern standards I'd consider that a pretty half-assed.
Mostly for the fact it's a highly unix usage.
If it was doing it
> Subject: Re: FAIL threads-1.09 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread 4.0
> From: Max Maischein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, March 15, 2006 4:43 pm
> To: "Jerry D. Hedden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Jerry D. Hedden wrote:
> > Would you mind running this again? I tested this against ActivePerl
> > 5.8.0/1/2/3
On Mar 15, 2006, at 20:21, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Neat work, Leo! Couple of comments & requests:
Thanks, yet unfinished though ...
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:14:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- initial/default HLL namespace is "parrot"
I didn't ask for a default, and I don't think
On Mar 15, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
chromatic wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
instead of using backticks and output redirection.
But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
around on CPA
On Mar 15, 2006, at 3:56 PM, Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
This compiles, prints out what looks like the right source code
(which at the moment is neither punie nor APL: "print 2²10;")
I hate unicode. That is 'print 2 10;'
Moin,
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 21:29, chromatic wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
> > I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
> > instead of using backticks and output redirection.
> > But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
> > around on C
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38733]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38733 >
In an effort to get APL working, I first have to be able to read an
APL program into m
chromatic wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
>
>
>>I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
>>instead of using backticks and output redirection.
>>But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
>>around on CPAN, but I have not yet found a Test::
>>
Putting aside the argument that most logic should be
in libraries and not scripts, what is the best
practice for writing test cases to verify that your
Perl scripts compile? My quick and dirty solution is
something like:
use Test::More tests => 1;
chomp (my $output = `perl -c $script 2>&1`);
i
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
> I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
> instead of using backticks and output redirection.
> But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
> around on CPAN, but I have not yet found a Test::
> module that seems appropri
Mark wrote:
: What about
:
: =comment explain
: The devil made me write this code
:
: =comment future
: Add a :devil option
:
: =comment design
: See www.dev.il/design/S25.pod
:
: =comment etc. etc.
: >:-)
In Perl 6 Pod, those are e
Neat work, Leo! Couple of comments & requests:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:14:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - initial/default HLL namespace is "parrot"
I didn't ask for a default, and I don't think there should be one, but I'm
interested in your reason for adding one.
Rationale: the
moin,
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 10:50, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-15 09:05]:
> >If your editor happens to be Vim then be aware that Ctrl+A adds
> >1 to the number currently under the cursor, or the next number
> >on the current line if the cursor isn't on a numbe
Moin,
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 23:24, Jan Dubois wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, David Golden wrote:
> > Steve Peters wrote:
> > > The problem was that newer Scalar-List-Utils uses an internal Perl
> > > function that Windows does not see as an exported function. This
> > > was changed with Perl 5.8
Moin,
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53, Smylers wrote:
> Dr Bean writes:
> > I've gotten comfortable with Test::More conventions, but it's
> > difficult in my editor to really quickly create lots of tests.
>
> Which editor is that?
>
> > is($o->index('You'), 1, 'objects index 1');
> > isnt($o->index
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:42:53PM +0100, Mark Overmeer wrote:
: * Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060315 01:52]:
: > That's why the general Perl 6 Pod syntax allows any block construct to be
: > labelled:
: >
: > =begin comment (explanation)
: > The devil made me write this code
: >
* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060315 01:52]:
> That's why the general Perl 6 Pod syntax allows any block construct to be
> labelled:
>
> =begin comment (explanation)
> The devil made me write this code
> =end comment
>
> =begin comment (future implementation)
> Add a :
The main reason this is hapenning is that it's not currently possible to update
CORE packages in ActivePerl, so any module that depends on a CORE package can
be suffering from this. This problem will persist until it becomes possible to
update core packages in ActivePerl.
It's certainly not an id
* Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-15 09:05]:
>If your editor happens to be Vim then be aware that Ctrl+A adds
>1 to the number currently under the cursor, or the next number
>on the current line if the cursor isn't on a number.
It also has “visual block mode,” which is initiated using Ctrl-v,
On 3/14/06, Jan Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, David Golden wrote:
> > Steve Peters wrote:
> > > The problem was that newer Scalar-List-Utils uses an internal Perl
> > > function that Windows does not see as an exported function. This was
> > > changed with Perl 5.8.8. Onc
Dr Bean writes:
> I've gotten comfortable with Test::More conventions, but it's
> difficult in my editor to really quickly create lots of tests.
Which editor is that?
> is($o->index('You'), 1, 'objects index 1');
> isnt($o->index(1), 1, 'objects index 2');
> isnt($o->index(2), 2, 'objects index
25 matches
Mail list logo
