On Wednesday 29 March 2006 19:15, Tels wrote:
> Anyway, I hope my longer replay was usefull and helped a bit, although I
> still can only guess what TDD stands for :)
>
TDD == Test Driven Development.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
-
Err. This one is better.
--
S pozdravem Michal Jurosz
Index: t/dynoplibs/myops.t
===
--- t/dynoplibs/myops.t (revision 12069)
+++ t/dynoplibs/myops.t (working copy)
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
use Parrot::Test tests => 8;
use Parrot::Config;
--- Tels wrote:
> although I still can only guess what TDD stands for :)
Tolkien Driven Development?
Googling around for examples of real world large systems developed
using TDD, I found http://www.agiledata.org/essays/tdd.html which
states:
The first reaction that many people have to agile tec
> Apache::Test looks like it might be the way to go. But it doesn't seem
> to play very nicely with Test::More,
that's not really true. yes, Apache-Test was based on Test.pm (for various
reasons I won't get into here) but I added Test::More support and use it all
the time. grep for stuff lik
Is Apache::Test the current state of the art when it comes to testing
that web apps work as expected?
I'm working on fleshing out the test suite for SVN::Web. I've already
got tests that verify that the basic functionality works, that generated
links are sane, and so on.
But I've been bitte
On 3/28/06, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> >> "Only the simplest of designs benefits from pre-coded tests, unless you
> >> have
> >> unlimited developer time."
> > needless to say I just don't believe this.
>
> Try writing a test suite ahead of time for a gra
Moin,
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 20:01, Fergal Daly wrote:
> On 3/28/06, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Moin,
> >
> > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 17:14, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > > I don't know of examples off-hand but I think in a way they're
> >
> > [snipabit]
> >
> > > Also, the problem with php (
Moin,
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 20:11, Fergal Daly wrote:
> On 3/28/06, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > > David Cantrell wrote:
> > >>Try writing a test suite ahead of time for a graphing library.
> > >> It's possible (indeed, it's trivial - just check the m
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:09:33PM +0100, Stefan Parvu wrote:
> >
> > There is no official "Perl6" yet, but there is
> > considerable development in
> > the Pugs project http://www.pugscode.org . In order
> > to run pugs, you'll
>
> To run Perl6 do I need Pugs ? I understood I would
> need only
> I'm not aware of any pre-built packages, but the
> Parrot VM should build
> and past most of its tests on either Solaris x86 or
> SPARC.
Right. I will give a spin under Solaris Express (aka
Nevada, Solaris 11) AMD64.
>
> There is no official "Perl6" yet, but there is
> considerable developm
# New Ticket Created by Jurosz Michal
# Please include the string: [perl #38810]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38810 >
This transaction appears to have no contentBypass Win32 MinGW infinite loop for "tree
11 matches
Mail list logo
