Matt Todd wrote:
> [Lots of stuff]
General comment: It's much easier to comprehend posts in mail lists or
reading through the archives if you quote something of what you're
responding to.
> Now, to the requirements talk: how important is the availability of
> revision history in this bare-b
From: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:05:29 -0700
[ Note to p6c: This thread is about the proposed and only partially
specified ".begin_eh"/".end_eh" directives that would specify exception
handling as a static property of a range of opcodes in a su
Are Parrot exceptions now, in fact, resumable? If they are, is that
important? Is anyone actually resuming execution after exception handlers
are called? I think we _can_ keep resumability, but I'm not sure I want us
to, and I definitely don't want to bother if no one wants it.
--
Chip Salzenbe
[ Note to p6c: This thread is about the proposed and only partially
specified ".begin_eh"/".end_eh" directives that would specify exception
handling as a static property of a range of opcodes in a subroutine,
rather than the current dynamic approach of C etc. I'm
including p6c in case Lisp
SVN r12936 fails for me while compiling.
cc -c -DAPPLLIB_EXP="/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.5/BSDPAN" -DHAS_FPSETMASK
-DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -pipe -I/usr/local/include -DPIC -fPIC -g -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Winline -Wshadow
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Waggr
> From: max demmelbauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
> i am new to this list.
> i wrote a small web-framework called webtek ( http://max.xaok.org/
> webtek ) in perl 5.8 and try now to port this to perl6 (inspired by
Unfortunately I only know very few German words, but webtek looks very
interes
