chromatic wrote:
> On Saturday 20 January 2007 10:36, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>> I can't help the feeling that Parrot is a nice linux x86 experiment.
>> Of course one can make the claim that not fixing the problems is my
>> problem.
>
> I so do; want commit access?
To which I say: I knew that
On Saturday 20 January 2007 10:36, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> I can't help the feeling that Parrot is a nice linux x86 experiment.
> Of course one can make the claim that not fixing the problems is my
> problem.
I so do; want commit access?
From PDD01 (docs/clip/pdd01_overview.pod):
Rec
>+ extended support for non-core platforms including Tru64
Huh? News to me. All the fixes for the problems recently reported by
me were to subsystems like pge. Thanks for those fixes but I would
hardly call the situation "extended support" since several core dumps
and less serious failures
I like the idea. Write up a more complete proposal and we'll all
review it. A few thoughts:
- The same mechanism could be used to implement Perl 6 sub wrapping,
so keep that in mind as you're thinking through the implementation
options. Names like "trace_sub" may be too specific to one par
> Will,
>
> I'm really deeply sorry for reverting stuff with my last commit.
Heh. Things happen. It's ok. Jerry did worse to tcl just before the
release. =-)
I appreciate the fix up. I was a certainly a little grumpy, but it's
fixed, before I even had a chance to sit back down and look at the
co
