Much of the guts of this step class's runstep() routine have been
refactored out into internal subs and methods in order to increase their
testability. 4 test files have been added. Statement coverage is
satisfactory, given that the remaining uncovered statements are of the
uncoverable, eval { $c
# New Ticket Created by Jeff Horwitz
# Please include the string: [perl #49532]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49532 >
After creating a new interpreter with Parrot_new(NULL) and destroying it
with Parrot_re
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Patch posted by Jarkko Hietaniemi on parrot-porters. I'll be looking at
> this patch in conjunction with other fixes to this class and its tests.
His patch makes perfect sense to me. (But then his nearly always do.)
You can't know what passing
Test coverage is quite high
(http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/configure-build/config-auto-gmp-pm.html)
and documentation issues have been addressed. Resolving ticket.
Since gen::cpu and auto::cpu have been merged into one step (named
auto::cpu but occupying the place in the configuration step sequence
formerly occupied by gen::cpu), this ticket is superseded. Resolving
ticket.
On Monday 07 January 2008 20:09:26 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> --- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist 2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
> +++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
> @@ -132,17 +132,22 @@
> $verbose = $conf->options->get('verbose');
> print "\n" if
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
--- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
+++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
@@ -132,17 +132,22 @@
Thanks, Jarkko. Since I'm working on correcting other problems with
auto::warnings and its tests in an
Patch posted by Jarkko Hietaniemi on parrot-porters. I'll be looking at
this patch in conjunction with other fixes to this class and its tests.
kid51
--- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
+++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
@@
Hello all,
I need to find something to work on to my Masters thesys.
I would like to work on something related to Perl 6 but I don't know
where to start looking. I need something that I can start and finish
in two semesters. Would you guys give me some suggestions please?
Thanks a lot,
--
Jonas
On Jan 8, 2008 4:32 PM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking more broadly, I find parrot's development very scattered.
> It's hard to find stuff. Was it on a mailing list? on a web page?
> Which web page? launchpad? some blog site? perlfoundation.org?
> parrotcode.org? One of
--- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
+++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
@@ -132,17 +132,22 @@
$verbose = $conf->options->get('verbose');
print "\n" if $verbose;
-# add on some extra warnings if requested
-pu
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
> > Can you mention what platform tests were failing on? t/shootout isn't
> > failing anymore on any platform I have access to. It's very slow, but not
> > failing.
>
> No, I didn't mean that I would maintain it. I just started a place for people
> to keep
chromatic wrote:
Regarding the function signatures in the vtable section: these should match
the calling conventions in PDD 07. I'm happy to patch them.
Go for it.
Regarding the mark vtable entry:
This method does not have
to call the "mark" method on any PMCs it marks--the
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
- Update all method definitions in all PMCs to be PCCMETHODs instead of
METHODs.
To allow for a standard deprecation cycle, we're breaking it into two
stages: first update all method definitions and calls so they use the
standard form currently flagged with "PCC
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
May I suggest the following extension to the 'use ' pragma, viz.
use in as constrained by local system>
Without wanting to sound too stupid - why not delegate the decision to a
class/resource loader of some manner, specify your resources as '[some
unique charactor
15 matches
Mail list logo
