On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:18:21 -0700
Geoffrey Broadwell (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Geoffrey Broadwell
> # Please include the string: [perl #53406]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.h
Here's another proposed patch for testing on various platforms. I'm trying to
get rid of some dodgy casts (which likely don't help C++ and processors with
stricter alignment than 32-bit x86). I'd also like to remove unnecessary
members from a few structs. This is the next step.
Are there any
The attached patch, not yet for application, uses the Valgrind memcheck header
to mark items on the stack as initialized. This clears up most of the
uninitialized read errors in our Valgrind checks, which makes it easier to
find real errors.
I'm not applying this patch yet because we need a co
From: "Klaas-Jan Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:37:18 +0100
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By popular demand, I've put my ongoing list of tasks for the concurrency
> implementation branch on the wiki. Mark a task you
Hi,
there was some benchmarking and discussion about perl5 slowness in ...
http://groups.google.at/group/perl.perl5.porters/browse_thread/thread/4ad7f6edacc97e1b/75af8abf89420f8c?hl=de&;
... and of course there were some remarks re parrot.
I'm not subscribed to p5p, so feel free to forward the me
hi,
there are some RT tickets for languages/amber, but this language does
not seem to be in the repository anymore.
I'd say the tickets can be rejected. Am I right?
48180
48182
48184
48186
48188
48192
kjs
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard
# Please include the string: [perl #53422]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53422 >
(gdb) r /Users/stef/svn/parrot/pbc_to_exe.pbc
...
CONSTANT_pbc_to_exe.pir => [
...
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:25:55 +0100
> "Klaas-Jan Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could anybody check out ticket #39845?
> > I replied on it multiple times, but somehow the "reply" button is not
> > vis
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:25:55 +0100
"Klaas-Jan Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could anybody check out ticket #39845?
> I replied on it multiple times, but somehow the "reply" button is not
> visible anymore when I log in.
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39845 has Reply b
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By popular demand, I've put my ongoing list of tasks for the concurrency
> implementation branch on the wiki. Mark a task you start to work on with
> your initials, so we know you're working on it:
>
> http://www.perlfoun
Hi,
Could anybody check out ticket #39845?
I replied on it multiple times, but somehow the "reply" button is not
visible anymore when I log in.
I think the ticket can be closed.
thanks heaps,
kjs
From: Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:51:43 -0700
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:33:50 -0400
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find pdump somewhat useful.
Ok. How do you actually *build* that? There doesn't seem to be a
Makefile rule for it, or ma
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:51:43 -0700
Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I find pdump somewhat useful.
>
> Ok. How do you actually *build* that? There doesn't seem to be a
> Makefile rule for it, or maybe I just haven't found it yet.
Oh, nevermind. It's there, I'm just braindead. Thanks!
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:33:50 -0400
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:59:03 -0700
>
>. . .
>
>Should this PMC implement the "pdump" functionality
> (src/packdump.c) as well as packfile.c/packout.c?
>
> I find p
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:16 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That seems cleaner to me; want to try that patch?
I'm out for the weekend, tomorrow I will work on it.
--
Salu2
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard
# Please include the string: [perl #53418]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53418 >
Somewhere the language folder is hardwired in which makes the second
argument of mk_
By popular demand, I've put my ongoing list of tasks for the concurrency
implementation branch on the wiki. Mark a task you start to work on with
your initials, so we know you're working on it:
http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?concurrency_tasks
Allison
# New Ticket Created by "Seneca Cunningham"
# Please include the string: [perl #53402]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53402 >
Currently, non-glibc platforms with backtrace support do not get any
symbols iden
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #53394]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53394 >
On Windows XP Home Edition, using gcc, the following test error is occurring:
Divide by
# New Ticket Created by Geoffrey Broadwell
# Please include the string: [perl #53406]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53406 >
At least MySQL and OpenGL have function prototypes either taking or
returning C or
On Sun Apr 27 12:56:26 2008, Karen Pauley wrote:
> I think we should try the wiki system you proposed. If chromatic agrees
> we could use his proposal of providing one month's work on Parrot for
> $5000 as a test case. This would allow us to see how well it works.
Now that I've written that I r
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #53396]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53396 >
On Windows XP Home Edition, using gcc, miscellaneous tests are failing.
See attached file
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #53392]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53392 >
On Windows XP Home Edition, using gcc, signed zero tests are failing. See
attachment. (Mu
On Fri Apr 25 00:06:30 2008, Conrad Schneiker wrote:
> Unless someone steps forward in the near future to do #2, I'd opt for
> doing #1 in the mean time.
I agree. I'll get the new category added to the system.
> There are other details to work out, but I first want to see
> if something alo
Here is a first look at the ideas I've worked up concerning the Perl 6
type system. It's an overview of the issues and usage of higher-order
types in comparison with traditional subtyping subclasses.
http://www.dlugosz.com/Perl6/
--John
25 matches
Mail list logo
