I've changed this ticket to indicate that it's waiting on spec
clarification as to the exact meaning of in regexes.
Pm
On Sun Jun 21 10:44:43 2009, moritz wrote:
> iterating over $*VM.kv shows more than one key:
>
> $ perl6 -e 'my $keys = 0; for %*VM.kv -> $k, $v { $keys++}; say $keys'
> 141
>
> Somehow the inner hash is flattened. Using a normal hash I couldn't
> reproduce
> this behaviour.
Now fixed in 6c6299f
On Sun Jun 21 23:57:17 2009, amoc wrote:
> : bash$ perl6
> : > 1 ?? 1,2 !! 3,4
> : Ternary error
> : bash$
>
> this is not wrong as infix:<,> has looser precedence than the ternary
> operator( ?? !! )
> but when ternary error occurs, the program emits the error and dies.
>
> should provide the pr
On Tue Jun 30 18:47:59 2009, KyleHa wrote:
> I've written a test for this in S12-methods/what.t in r27345.
Thanks! Closing ticket!
Pm
I've written a test for this in S12-methods/what.t in r27345.
# RT #66928
{
lives_ok { &infix:<+>.WHAT }, 'Can .WHAT built-in infix op';
isa_ok &infix:<+>.WHAT, Multi, '.WHAT of built-in infix op is Multi';
}
Kyle
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Patrick R. Michaud via
RT wrote:
> Now fi
Now fixed in ee1fd13:
$ ./perl6
> say &infix:<+>.WHAT
Multi()
Assigning to moritz++ for spectest coverage, if needed.
Pm
On Sun Oct 26 12:27:26 2008, masak wrote:
> Rakudo r32151 contains a bug which makes it "read" a nonexistent blank
> line at the end of files.
>
> $ wc README | awk '{ print $1 }'
> 102
>
> $ =$*IN; }; say $l'
> 103
IO.pod:1207 claims that "IO.eof" is gone, to be replaced with
C. But I can't s
On Fri Jun 26 09:08:56 2009, moritz wrote:
> 18:07 <@moritz_> rakudo: class NotAny is Object { };
> 18:07 < p6eval> rakudo 6c43f9: OUTPUT«Could not build C3 linearization:
> ambiguous hierarchyin Main (/tmp/dXMaaubcDg:2)»
>
Fixed in git aa1a18d and added spectest to S12-class/inh
Author: ruoso
Date: 2009-06-30 19:18:24 +0200 (Tue, 30 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27331
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S11-modules.pod
Log:
[spec/S11] better to be sorry than not doing. here is my proposed change to the
representation of how a module is loaded
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S11-modules.po
On Fri Jun 26 07:56:40 2009, masak wrote:
> rakudo: my $a = :x[]
> rakudo 6c43f9: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in find_method() [...]
> * masak submits rakuodbug
> rakudo: :x[]
> rakudo 6c43f9: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in find_method() [...]
What should $a contain in the above case? I.e., what's the
On Sat Apr 11 15:02:06 2009, masak wrote:
> rakudo: class A { has $.cl = { self.say } }; A.new.cl()()
> rakudo 5b679a: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_pmc_keyed() [...]
> * masak submits rakudobug 307
Works in latest Rakudo; added test to S12-attributes/instance.t to make
sure it keeps on working.
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
> On Fri Jun 26 07:56:40 2009, masak wrote:
>> rakudo: my $a = :x[]
>> rakudo 6c43f9: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in find_method() [...]
>> * masak submits rakuodbug
>> rakudo: :x[]
>> rakudo 6c43f9: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in find_method() [...]
>
>
> What should $
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-30 18:14:08 +0200 (Tue, 30 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27324
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S11-modules.pod
Log:
[S11] attempt to break down use/require further for ELISHEVA++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S11-modules.pod
On Mon Jun 29 10:34:57 2009, KyleHa wrote:
> I discovered this while trying to write a test for another bug report.
> Here's the minimal test, which I'll put in
> pugs/t/spec/S04-declarations/state-rtX.t once I get a number back
> from this bug report.
>
The bug is fixed and that test now pas
The infix: operator has now been added in Rakudo a4978b9, with a
test added to t/spec/S03-operator/misc.t in r27322.
Closing ticket,
Pm
On Sun Jun 28 12:05:28 2009, moritz wrote:
> 20:11 <@moritz_> rakudo: sub a { state $x //= 3; $x++; say $x }; a(); a()
> 20:12 < p6eval> rakudo 6c43f9: OUTPUT«44»
>
> Although that's better written as 'state $x = 3', it should IMHO give
> the result 4\n5\n, not 4\n4\n
>
Aye, agree. And after gi
Rakudo 95a2c4f now gives a more useful error message when returning the
failure for not finding a given substring:
pmich...@orange:~/rakudo$ ./perl6
> say index "abcd", "x"
Substring 'x' not found in 'abcd'
Closing ticket, thanks!
Pm
On Tue Jun 30 01:56:39 2009, allb...@ece.cmu.edu wrote:
> I thought unary + was scalar/item? context in perl6, not numify.
When in doubt, check the spec. :)
S03 (]):
] Unlike in Perl 5, where + is a no-op, this operator coerces to
] numeric context in Perl 6.
So prefix:<~> stringifies, prefix:<+
On Sat Jun 20 12:15:49 2009, pmichaud wrote:
> The following code demonstrates that MultiSub and Perl6MultiSub
> do not stringify to a reasonable name.
>
> for 1.^methods {
> say ">$_< {$_.PARROT}";
> }
>
Fixed these in git 466baf6, plus added a test for multi-sub
stringificati
On Wed Jun 24 12:05:29 2009, masak wrote:
> rakudo: say &infix:<+>
> rakudo 0e0671: OUTPUT«10»
> why is this giving 10 with no args?
> oh
> that's... rubbish, I'd say
> * masak submits rakudobug
As of git 466baf6 it gives the more sensible:
> say &infix:<+>
infix:+
Though infix:<+> would p
Now fixed in e0a9d86, and we now have several operators being defined in
the setting (along with tests using those operators).
Closing ticket, thanks!
Pm
On Mon Jun 29 00:36:42 2009, fernandocor...@gmail.com wrote:
> implemented:
> - "not" "Object"'s method
> - "sign" "Num"'s method
>
> Thats my first time to send a patch, I don't know if its OK, but I really
> want to help.
Thank you for the patches! However, they may need some refactoring (or
On Sun Apr 19 10:11:22 2009, cosmicnetworks wrote:
> Please find the patch attached. Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> I've tested this code against the chdir and cwd spec tests.
>
I fixed a nit in the $*CWD implementation and applied that one. The test
file all passed, so added that t
Oops, forgot to cc this to the list...
On Tue Jun 30 05:30:14 2009, jn...@jnthn.net wrote:
> On Thu May 28 11:52:22 2009, pmichaud wrote:
> > See S12:611:
> >
> > "If you attempt to get around this by declaring C as
> > a method rather than a submethod, that will also be flagged as a
dire
On Fri Mar 13 05:23:29 2009, masak wrote:
> std: sub foo(1,2,3) {...}
> std 25816: OUTPUT«ok 00:02 35m»
> Heh
> jnthn, is that already known?
> I didn't even know that was valid syntax... :-P
However, it is valid syntax, and pretty cool syntax at that. It's also
supported in Rakudo as of git
# New Ticket Created by "Kyle Hasselbacher"
# Please include the string: [perl #67058]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67058 >
I discovered this while trying to write a test for another bug report.
Here's th
On Mon Jun 22 06:38:06 2009, masak wrote:
> std: subset A of Int;
> std 27169: OUTPUT«ok 00:02 35m»
> rakudo: subset A of Int;
> rakudo 1b06df: OUTPUT«Statement not terminated properly at
> line 2 [...]
> * masak submits rakudobug
Now works in git 1831bd1. Unfudged the test from kyle++ that c
On Mon Jun 29 13:45:16 2009, druoso wrote:
> rakudo: say [~] [] xx 3
> rakudo 1831bd: OUTPUT«a b ca b ca b c»
> rakudo: say [X] [] xx 3
> rakudo 1831bd: OUTPUT«Statement not terminated properly at line
> 2, near "[] "in Main (src/gen_setting.pm:3257)»
> std: say [X] [] xx 3
> std 27309: OU
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Brandon S. Allbery
KF8NH wrote:
> I thought unary + was scalar/item? context in perl6, not numify.
+ is numeric context - which is one of several subtypes of item
context. Generic item context is item(); + numifies; ? boolifies; ~
stringifies.
I'm guessing you
On Mon Mar 02 01:03:30 2009, ml...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
>
> Rakudo 08b789048:
> ./perl6 -e 'class A { submethod BUILD(*...@a) { say @a.perl } }; A.new(x
=> 3)'
> Could not locate a method 'perl' to invoke on class 'A'.
>
> Now that's bad. BUILD shouldn't receive the initially created ob
On Thu Apr 02 06:26:38 2009, masak wrote:
> rakudo: class A { has $.foo; submethod BUILD($obj) { $!foo = 7
> } }; say A.new.foo;
> rakudo c40f3b: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in getprop() [...]
> * masak submits rakudobug
Thanks to some fixes a little while back, this now works:
<@jnthn> rakudo: clas
# New Ticket Created by Daniel Ruoso
# Please include the string: [perl #67064]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67064 >
rakudo: say [~] [] xx 3
rakudo 1831bd: OUTPUT«a b ca b ca b c»
rakudo: say [X] [] xx
On Tue Nov 18 08:07:50 2008, mor...@casella.faui2k3.org wrote:
> Rakudo needs to have the 'is rw' trait on classes at some point (which
> according to S12 implies that all attributes are rw by default).
>
After some changes yesterday, we now implement this and pass all of the
tests in S12-class/rw
I thought unary + was scalar/item? context in perl6, not numify.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon universityKF8NH
PGP.si
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #67050]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67050 >
13:52 < zulon> rakudo: say "3".Num
13:52 < p6eval> rakudo d95def: OUTPUT«Method 'Num' not
35 matches
Mail list logo
