On Mon Dec 14 05:30:27 2009, masak wrote:
> This be Rakudo 7ef386.
>
> $ perl6 -e 'class A {}; class B does A {}'
> Method '!select' not found for invocant of class ''
>
> That should not be an error at all according to the spec, IIRC; it
> should snapshot the class and use the result as a role.
On Mon Dec 07 06:26:06 2009, rblasch wrote:
> I think I can reproduce the issue. For a reason I haven't found yet, an
> installed parrot's pbc_to_exe runs the following.
>
> mt.exe -nologo -manifest perl6.exe.manifest
> -outputresource:perl6.exe.manifest;1
>
> The correct command would be as fol
On Sun May 17 11:57:26 2009, masak wrote:
> $ cat A.pm
> sub print(*...@args) is export(:DEFAULT) {
> say "I'm in ur module, overriding ur functions!";
> }
> $ cat B.pm
> print "OH HAI"
> $ perl6 -e 'use A; use B'
> I'm in ur module, overriding ur functions!
>
> Finally, getting some support f
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #74646]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=74646 >
rakudo: class A { multi method foo($a) { "general" }; multi
submethod foo(Str $a) { "sp
On Wed Feb 25 00:52:37 2009, matt-w wrote:
>
> Test case found by masak:
>
> 08:47 < masak> rakudo: class A {}; A::B.parse("")
> 08:47 < p6eval> rakudo 7f8ba6: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in
> invoke()current
> instr.: '_block14' pc 60 (EVAL_20:39)»
>
Now gives:
> class A {}; A::B.
On Mon Dec 29 08:40:57 2008, masak wrote:
> S12:
>
> To declare a lexically scoped class, use my class.
>
> This currently does not work in Rakudo.
Lexical class declarations now work, and I've enabled the tests written
for this ticket (and written several more on top of it - we're not
perfect y
# New Ticket Created by Richard Hainsworth
# Please include the string: [perl #74638]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=74638 >
from #perl6 Apr 24
this works:
rakudo: class B {has @.a;has $.u;method m { for $.
On Mon Feb 15 02:53:52 2010, masak wrote:
> rakudo: (class { method foo() { say "OH HAI" } }).foo
> rakudo 70667a: OUTPUT«Invalid namespace key in set_pmc_keyed
[...]
> locally, that gives me a failed assertion [in Parrot], too.
> * masak submits rakudobug
> rakudo: (class {}).foo
> rakudo 706
On Fri Dec 18 07:05:30 2009, pmichaud wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:40:57PM -0800, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> > $ perl6 -e 'given 42 { when 42 { continue }; say "OH HAI" }'
> > OH HAI
> >
> > The spec has been changed so that 'continue' is now spelled 'nobreak'.
>
> ...and has since been changed a
On Sat Aug 08 20:44:24 2009, ajs wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
>
> > Moritz Lenz (>), Aaron Sherman (via RT) (>>):
> > >>> say Str.^methods[0]
> > >> sprintf
> > >> [...]
> > >>> say Str.^methods[0].name
> > >> pred
> > >
> > > Yes, there's a method 'pred'. So what?
>
# New Ticket Created by Pawel Pabian
# Please include the string: [perl #74648]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=74648 >
Moscow build:
rakudo: my $x = Inf; say ($x.Int / 1).WHAT; # this one looks bad,
I hav
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #74640]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=74640 >
rakudo: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510e0
rakudo 06fe9a: OUTPUT«M
On Fri Apr 23 07:56:49 2010, masak wrote:
> question is, why doesn't &time complain when it gets >0 arguments?
> masak: bug, I'd say
> * masak submits rakudobug
> after it's fixed, at least JimmyZ and the likes of him will
> get a runtime error.
Moved &time to the setting, which uses the Perl 6
# New Ticket Created by Richard Hainsworth
# Please include the string: [perl #74636]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=74636 >
code executed on #perl6 April24
I would expect both outputs to be the same. But t
14 matches
Mail list logo
