On Tue Nov 16 14:45:34 2010, masak wrote:
> blog post!
> http://strangelyconsistent.org/blog/november-16-2010-the-polite-revolt
> rakudo: sub foo($x? is rw) { $x = "OH HAI" }; foo()
> rakudo 015d77: OUTPUT«Cannot modify readonly value [...]
> discuss.
> * masak submits rakudobug
> * masak looks
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #79294]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=79294 >
rakudo: say $*PERL
rakudo 015d77: OUTPUT«name rakudoversion 2010.10-22-g015d77b
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: 44511d749bbbae4286dd1675ad6264c72acd2433
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/44511d749bbbae4286dd1675ad6264c72acd2433
Author: TimToady
Date: 2010-11-16 (Tue, 16 Nov 2010)
Changed paths:
M S06-routines.pod
Log Me
Larry (>>), Dan (>):
>> The lack of base 4 numbers in Real Life seems to me to justify the
>> convention. Do you have a use case?
>
> Real Life on Earth is base-4 coded :-p
Heh. :)
> hey, do we have tr/// equivalent already?
In S05? Yes, since the get-go.
In Rakudo? You do know that it's freel
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #79288]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=79288 >
blog post!
http://strangelyconsistent.org/blog/november-16-2010-the-polite-revolt
raku
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 17 2010, at 05:16 , Larry Wall wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:11:01PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
> : Carl Mäsak wrote:
> : >Darren (>):
> : >>While I haven't seen any prior art on this, I'm thinking that it would be
> : >>nice for a sense
Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:11:01PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
: Carl Mäsak wrote:
: >Darren (>):
: >>While I haven't seen any prior art on this, I'm thinking that it would be
: >>nice for a sense of completeness or parity to have an 0a syntax specific to
: >>base-4 that complem
> : >Darren (>):
> : >>While I haven't seen any prior art on this, I'm thinking that it would be
> : >>nice for a sense of completeness or parity to have an 0a syntax specific
> to
> : >>base-4 that complements the 4 that we have now for bases 2,8,16,10.
> : >
> : >You're joking, right?
> :
> : No
On 11/16/2010 08:46 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> So, any thoughts on this?
A wonderful application for a module.
And don't we already have
:4<1230>
for base 4 literals? With a simple scheme that can be used up to base 36?
Cheers,
Moritz
How thinks that Perl 6 should really become smaller over ti
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 2.10.0
"Pesquet's". Parrot is a virtual machine aimed at running all dynamic
languages.
Parrot 2.10.0 is available on Parrot's FTP site
(ftp://ftp.parrot.org/pub/parrot/releases/devel/2.10.0/), or follow
the download instructions at http:/
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:11:01PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
: Carl Mäsak wrote:
: >Darren (>):
: >>While I haven't seen any prior art on this, I'm thinking that it would be
: >>nice for a sense of completeness or parity to have an 0a syntax specific to
: >>base-4 that complements the 4 that we h
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Darren (>):
While I haven't seen any prior art on this, I'm thinking that it would be
nice for a sense of completeness or parity to have an 0a syntax specific to
base-4 that complements the 4 that we have now for bases 2,8,16,10.
You're joking, right?
No, its a serious idea
Darren (>):
> While I haven't seen any prior art on this, I'm thinking that it would be
> nice for a sense of completeness or parity to have an 0a syntax specific to
> base-4 that complements the 4 that we have now for bases 2,8,16,10.
You're joking, right?
// Carl
A simple proposal ...
While I haven't seen any prior art on this, I'm thinking that it would be nice
for a sense of completeness or parity to have an 0a syntax specific to base-4
that complements the 4 that we have now for bases 2,8,16,10.
With that addition, the line-up would look like this:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: 977d920241c26aec8913d5f37c218948b28bbb23
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/977d920241c26aec8913d5f37c218948b28bbb23
Author: TimToady
Date: 2010-11-16 (Tue, 16 Nov 2010)
Changed paths:
M S02-bits.pod
Log Messag
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: 8b43df0b09582837dfb91bf69f3d65ce966cad35
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/8b43df0b09582837dfb91bf69f3d65ce966cad35
Author: Jonathan Scott Duff
Date: 2010-11-16 (Tue, 16 Nov 2010)
Changed paths:
M S09-data.pod
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: c0b0845586be1d1fe07106cd2bb13acf56f13a20
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/c0b0845586be1d1fe07106cd2bb13acf56f13a20
Author: Jonathan Scott Duff
Date: 2010-11-16 (Tue, 16 Nov 2010)
Changed paths:
M S09-data.pod
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #79270]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=79270 >
rakudo: my @a = ; @a[0 ..^ *-1] >>~=>> "\n"; say @a.perl
rakudo 015d77: OUTPUT«(timeou
# New Ticket Created by Steve Schulze
# Please include the string: [perl #79242]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=79242 >
use Test; # remove this line, and it works
use MONKEY_TYPING;
augment class Any {
Jon Lang wrote:
Darren Duncan wrote:
This said, I specifically think that a simple pair of curly braces is the
best way to mark a Set.
{1,2,3} # a Set of those 3 elements
... and this is also how it is done in maths I believe (and in Muldis D).
In fact, I strongly support this assuming that
20 matches
Mail list logo
