[perl #127036] .flatmap doesn't flatten

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #127036] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127036 > It seems .flatmap method does not flatten. Running the example in the docs produces wrong

Re: release?

2015-12-27 Thread Kaare Rasmussen
Hi webmind I'm a bit confused, there is a major release for Perl 6, but I know wonder if this is the 6.0.0 release or when this will be? I understand your confusion. Most people would expect something downloadable, and there is actually a Rakudo release to go. But 6.c is really the promise t

[perl #127044] is-prime sub lies

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #127044] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127044 > is-prime coerces its argument into an Int, which produces some false results: m: say is-

[perl #127049] [BUG] expected Array[Str] but got Array[Str].new("") (2015.12 Regression from 2015.11)

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Weidenbaum # Please include the string: [perl #127049] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127049 > In Config::TOML, this is fixed by removing the Str type from Array: https://github.com

[perl #127046] [BUG] Tests fail when contained in one file, pass when separated (2015.12 Regression from 2015.11)

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Weidenbaum # Please include the string: [perl #127046] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127046 > The following test fails: [not ok] https://bitbucket.org/atweiden/config-toml-dev/sr

[perl #127051] [LTA ERROR] 1/1.WHAT

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #127051] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127051 > The error message can probably be improved, as from user's perspective, there's no "de" p

release?

2015-12-27 Thread webmind
Hiya, I'm a bit confused, there is a major release for Perl 6, but I know wonder if this is the 6.0.0 release or when this will be? Thanks web -- GPG Key: https://u2m.nl/data/webmind.asc GPG Fingerprint: 0506976E 234653B4 A628EC33 E23D16EE FCF154AE XMPP webm...@puscii.nl: D79970A8 7EC

[perl #127031] Automatic precompilation

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by . # Please include the string: [perl #127031] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127031 > Just no. Precompilation is a fine idea. Automatic precompilation is an OK idea. Automatic precompil

[perl #127042] [BUG] ^ and $ (also ^^ and $$) exchange their meanings wrongly in Lookbehind assertions

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by 柯拓 # Please include the string: [perl #127042] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127042 > $ perl6 -e 'say "foo".subst(//, "^").subst(//, "\$")'$foo^ # should be ^foo$

[perl #127032] [BUG] Install scripts don't respect DESTDIR

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by spider-mario # Please include the string: [perl #127032] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127032 > I am trying to package Rakudo 2015.12, and my build script runs: perl Configure.pl --pre

Re: Hello List! Error found in glossary.pod

2015-12-27 Thread Will Coleda
It's defining what NST means; the acronym is still a thing. On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 9:10 AM, James Ellis Osborne III wrote: > Line 1585:1587 Reads: > -- > =head2 NST > > No Such Thing. > -- > > Surely Thi[j]s Is No Longer True? > > -jas -- Will "Coke" C

[perl #127050] postfix:<++> stips mixins

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Wenzel Peppmeyer # Please include the string: [perl #127050] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127050 > role R { method Str() {'hidden!'} }; my $i = 1 but R; sub f(\bound){ put bound }; f($

Re: [perl #127048] AutoReply: Emoji sequences with ZERO WIDTH JOINER counted as separate chars when they probably shouldn't

2015-12-27 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev
It should also be noted that ZERO WIDTH JOINER is used for other purposes too: https://books.google.ee/books?id=wn5sXG8bEAcC&lpg=PA287&ots=J1bym1VbXE&dq=unicode%20%22ZERO%20WIDTH%20JOINER&pg=PA287#v=onepage&q=unicode%20%22ZERO%20WIDTH%20JOINER&f=false But I'm not sure if it should affect the chara

[perl #127048] Emoji sequences with ZERO WIDTH JOINER counted as separate chars when they probably shouldn't

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Alex Jakimenko # Please include the string: [perl #127048] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127048 > This is a continuation of https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=127047 >From

[perl #127047] Emoji modifiers counted as separate chars when they probably shouldn't

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Elizabeth Mattijsen # Please include the string: [perl #127047] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127047 > [22:52:03] folks, so am I getting it right that emoji skin color modifie

Happy Perlmas

2015-12-27 Thread Frederik Schwarzer
Congrats for reaching this milestone. :) And thanks to all the contributors who kept going despite the ranting and who are practicing kindness towards trolls and ranters. Understanding that trolls can be transformed into users or contributors with a warm heart-felt hug is pure gold. :) Keep it

Re: [perl #127037] [BUG] Typo in installation error message : "No writeable path found"

2015-12-27 Thread Rares Aioanei
"writable" is way more popular, for what it's worth. I checked both Oxford and Merriam-Webster dictionaries and "writeable" isn't even there. Just my two cents. On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Writeable appears as an acceptable spelling in a number of

Re: [perl #127037] [BUG] Typo in installation error message : "No writeable path found"

2015-12-27 Thread Parrot Raiser
Writeable appears as an acceptable spelling in a number of sources, e.g. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/writeable On 12/26/15, Rares Aioanei wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Rares Aioanei > # Please include the string: [perl #127037] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about

Re: Perl 6.c!!

2015-12-27 Thread Brock Wilcox
No substantial rumors that I've heard. I've been contributing to doc.perl6.org, maybe we can get that good enough to bind :) On Dec 27, 2015 05:35, "Tom Browder" wrote: > Thank you Perl 6 devs--what a great Christmas present! > > Now I'm looking forward to buying my first paper copy of a Perl 6.c

Hello List! Error found in glossary.pod

2015-12-27 Thread James Ellis Osborne III
Line 1585:1587 Reads: -- =head2 NST No Such Thing. -- Surely Thi[j]s Is No Longer True? -jas

Perl 6.c!!

2015-12-27 Thread Tom Browder
Thank you Perl 6 devs--what a great Christmas present! Now I'm looking forward to buying my first paper copy of a Perl 6.c book. Any rumours of who/what/when out there in Perl 6 land? Best, -Tom

[perl #127041] is looser LTA error if used incorrectly

2015-12-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Lloyd Fournier # Please include the string: [perl #127041] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127041 > 21:46 < lizmat> m: sub a is looser {} 21:46 <+camelia> rakudo-moar 7e106c: OUTPUT«===SO