Re: Rakudo Star - a useful, usable, "early adopter" distribution of Perl 6

On 10/07/29 07:23 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On behalf of the Rakudo and Perl 6 development teams, I'm happy to > announce the July 2010 release of "Rakudo Star", a useful and usable > distribution of Perl 6. The tarball for the July 2010 release is > available from

Re: [perl #49910] "3e4" does not parse as 30000

On 08/02/05 15:21 -0800, Zev Benjamin via RT wrote: > There is a patch in RT #50550. why on earth did i get a copy of your answer? seems that it forged a from: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] something's fishy in there... jérôme -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wrapping up the OO implementation

On 07/10/02 19:05 -0700, Allison Randal wrote: > Jerome Quelin wrote: >> other question: which directory has the higher priority for you? > > They all need to be fixed before we roll the branch back into the trunk, so > they're all equally important. committed some fin

Re: wrapping up the OO implementation

On 07/10/02 12:58 +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote: > > $IX = find_type "ClassName" > > $PX = new $IX > > > > to: > > > > $PX = new "ClassName" here's a patch for examples/streams. if you ack it, i'll apply it (i should still have the c

Re: wrapping up the OO implementation

On 07/10/01 15:58 -0700, Allison Randal wrote: > - Pick a directory and grep (or ack) for 'find_type'. It was a common idiom > in the old object system that doesn't work any more. Change: > > $IX = find_type "ClassName" > $PX = new $IX > > to: > > $PX = new "ClassName" what about: find_type $

Re: Current win32 linking issues: Summary

On 07/08/22 11:16 +0200, Ron Blaschke wrote: > Jerry mentioned yesterday that there shouldn't be any failures for a > release, which makes sense as it would only upset users. Maybe there > should be a ticket for the failures then? Or an environment variable > like PARROT_PORTER which makes all te

Re: parrotbug: Can it handle attachments?

On 07/08/12 22:11 -0400, James E Keenan wrote: > docs/submissions.pod states: > "DO NOT paste the content of the new file or files into the body of the > message." > > I.e., send the content as an email attachment. > > But whenever I have used the 'parrotbug' utility, I have never seen a way > to

Re: [perl #41601] [BUG] parrotbug b0rken

On 07/03/18 18:06 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:51:32PM +0100, Paul Cochrane wrote: > > parrotbug also has the save option, and it saves a lot of > > configuration information. I'm asking if the "send" feature can be > > removed, which is the bit which seems to be broke

Re: [perl #41743] [PATCH] Make all but (perl5|pugs|t) have a MAINTAINER

me Quelini > +E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] not that i'm actively maintaining them actively (busy elsewhere), but it's "Jerome Quelin", not "Jerome Quelini". email is fine. i guess you also forgot to patch MANIFEST with all those newly created files, uh? :-) jérôme -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #41601] [BUG] parrotbug b0rken

On 07/02/24 12:00 +0100, Paul Cochrane wrote: > >parrotbug seems to be broken on win32. > Actually, I think it's broken on all platforms. as parrotbug (the program) father, i'd like to add that i don't have time to work on it. (and it seems to show up) anyone wanting to work on it or even adopt i

Re: No C op with PMC arguments?

On 04/11/03 11:19 -0500, Matt Fowles wrote: > What gets more fun is raising something (usually e) to a matrix power. > Then you have to do things with the Jordan Connical form and > decompose your matrix into eigenvalues and stuff. On the plus side, > this also allows you to define the sin and co

Re: Performance Statistics (and Graphs!)

On 04/11/02 22:10 -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote: > We have collected benchmark data for regular and > optimized builds with and without JIT from June 1st through October. What about comparing against perl*, python and ruby? Nice work, Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debug ops?

On 04/11/01 11:17 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: > But either at startup or dynamically, individual loggers can be > enabled to start (or stop) outputing messages that exceed a given > threshhold (debug, info, warn, error, fatal). One thing that I really miss in this kind of logging framework is t

Re: [perl #32112] [PATCH] Fixes for Befunge interpreter

On 04/10/23 08:25 -0700, Stepan Roh wrote: > While playing with Parrot I found a few bugs and problems in Befunge > interpreter. Although it is not important part of Parrot What? Not important? I was one of the first small languages implemented! And saying that befunge is not important is like sa

Re: [pid-mode.el] cannot edit

On 04/10/05 10:30 -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote: > On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:39:59 +0100, Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > switch to emacs. :) > > Or patch pir-mode.el, your choice. > That should be something like: [snip] > no? John Paul Wall

Re: [pid-mode.el] cannot edit

On 04/10/03 15:10 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote: > > > There are further changes I would like to make to pir-mode.el, mostly > > > simple bug-fixes and clean-ups. > > Then, send the whole patch and I'll apply it for you. > Here you go: [snip] > ;;; pir-mode.el ends here Applied with due credi

Re: [pid-mode.el] cannot edit

On 04/10/03 12:09 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote: > > Works like a charm. Thanx a lot. > > Does it still works with emacs? > Yes, as far as I can tell. > > > If yes, then do you have commit rights? > I don't have commit rights. > > There are further changes I would like to make to pir-mode.el,

Re: [pid-mode.el] cannot edit

On 04/10/03 00:33 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote: > > Now it works, I can use spaces and returns. But while fontifying, I get: > > > > (5) (warning/warning) Error caught in `font-lock-pre-idle-hook': > > (invalid-regexp Invalid syntax designator) > > How about this fix: > > Index: pir-mode.el

Re: [pid-mode.el] cannot edit

On 04/10/01 23:22 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote: > Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And the minibuffer tells me: > > Symbol's function definition is void: line-beginning-position > > I'm using xemacs 21.4.14 > > How about defining

[pid-mode.el] cannot edit

Hi, I tried the pir-mode provided in the editor/ subdir. And when opening a .imc file (I've associated .pir with pir-mode + font-lock-mode), I cannot type spaces or carriage returns: (24) (warning/warning) Error caught in `font-lock-pre-idle-hook': (invalid-regexp Invalid syntax designator) And

Re: Benchmark Stuff

On Tuesday 24 August 2004 20:29, Joshua Gatcomb wrote: > I don't know what kind of layout/data would be useful > to people so let me know if you want something else. > I will update every Tuesday morning. And here's a script that use your sqlite database to generate rrd file and graph results. Y

Re: Tight typing by default?

On Wednesday 25 August 2004 14:38, Dan Sugalski wrote: > For our purposes I think the typing should go: > platform int->float->bignum No int64? Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [subject mangled to keep RT clean] t/pmc/fixedpmcarray.t test ...

On Monday 12 July 2004 22:40, Nicholas Clark wrote: > osname= darwin > osvers= 7.0 > arch= darwin-thread-multi-2level > cc= cc > --- > Flags: [...] > --- > Summary of my parrot 0.1.0 configuration: [...] > --- > Environment: [...] Eh! It looks like parrotbug is working! *And* that someone i

Re: our own decimal math lib

On Friday 25 June 2004 03:47, André Pang wrote: > It only seems fair to be using the same library as Python, if you want > a decent bignum speed comparison. We don't mind being unfair, as long as parrot's winning :-) Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #28915] parrotbug can only send mail

On Monday 17 May 2004 19:55, ibotty wrote: > J> Either use --save as a command-line flag, or you will be prompted > for an > > action if you don't supply one of --send, --save, --dump. > > I you chose to save to a file, either provide a filename with > > --output (or -o or --output-file), or you wi

Re: new version of parrotbug

On Monday 17 May 2004 19:26, Jerome Quelin wrote: > Since I got some time to work on it... version 0.5.0 of parrotbug is > out! And version 0.6.0 takes flag --quiet (or -q) into account. (I *know* I'm bumping version numbers too fast :-) ) If somebody sees some bugs in parrotbug, or

new version of parrotbug

Since I got some time to work on it... version 0.5.0 of parrotbug is out! Changes: one can re-edit the report before sending it. HTH, Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug #28915 is to be closed.

On Monday 17 May 2004 18:50, you wrote: > Ticket 28915 is resolved, but I don't have rt rights to change its > status: can somebody close it please? Oh, and ticket 29653 (fake one) too. Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug #28915 is to be closed.

Ticket 28915 is resolved, but I don't have rt rights to change its status: can somebody close it please? Thx, Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #28915] parrotbug can only send mail

On Saturday 17 April 2004 22:44, Nicholas Clark wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Nicholas Clark > # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=28915 > > > parrotbug can only send mail. ok, it can now! Either use --save as a command-line flag, or you will be prompted for an action if you do

Re: [perl #29653] segf oiazerg iozerg

On Monday 17 May 2004 15:14, Nicholas Clark wrote: > So the new parrotbug works? :-) Not yet, but I finally found some tuits to work on it! :-) And sorry for the noise, I forgot to put the --test flag. > > LANGUAGE=en_US:en >? > Isn't that an oxymoron? Uh? There are other

Re: File stat info

Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 8:08 PM +0200 4/28/04, Jerome Quelin wrote: > >Dan Sugalski wrote: > >> CTIME Creation time > >Will unixen use this for change time? (also spelled ctime too) > > Nope, for that they use mtime. We can expand the names to skip th

Re: File stat info

Dan Sugalski wrote: [...] > CTIME Creation time Will unixen use this for change time? (also spelled ctime too) > OWNER_READTrue if owner can read > OWNER_WRITE True if owner can write > OWNER_EXECUTE True if owner can run > OWNER_DELETE True if owner can delete > GROUP_CD True

Re: [P6C] problems with revision 1.5 of lib/Parrot/Test.pm

Allison Randal wrote: > Okay, languages/perl6 is failing all its tests. [...] > Will or Jerome, could you take a minute to explain the direction > you're taking Parrot::Test? I'll patch P6C::TestCompiler to match the > new setup, but I want to do an "architecture sanity check" first. I'm sorry, I'

Re: [perl #28915] parrotbug can only send mail

Nicholas Clark (via RT) wrote: > parrotbug can only send mail. > This isn't that useful on systems where mail is accepted by sendmail, > but will never get delivered. > perlbug is able to save the bug report to a file, which can then be > copied over to a system that can send mail. > > Would it be

Re: [perl #28035] Languages testing

Will Coleda wrote: > Update to this patch - > Jerome has identified an issue with the language testing patch - [...] > The following bits of the Parrot::Test patch need to be reversed, > which then keeps the perl6 test suite happy, and should remove the > last /showstopper/ to applying the patch.

Re: compiling hangs at core_ops_cg.c

Dan Sugalski wrote: > That'd be about three to four for the CPU you've got, and when you > throw in swapping I can see the compile time for that module hitting > 15-20 minutes. At least. FYI, I ran into the same problem some months ago. I had 128 Mb on my P4 1.3GHz Linux box. The total compile ti

[PATCH] benchmark vpm uses warnings which are not available in perl 5.005

Here after is a patch that changes a "use warnings" into $^W = 1 in order to be able to check perl 5.005 We then get: $ perl ./tools/dev/parrotbench.pl -c ../parrot_bench.conf -b vpm\$ Numbers are relative to the first one. (lower is better) p p-j p-C p5.5p5.8py

Re: This week's summary

The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote: > Parrotbug reaches 0.0.1 > Jerome Quelin responded to Dan's otherwise ignored request for a > parrot equivalent of perlbug when he offered an implementation of > parrotbug for everyone's perusal, but didn't go so far to add it to > t

Re: parrotbug working...

Robert Spier wrote: > > The mails are indeed sent to parrotbug, parrotstatus-ok and > > parrotstatus-nok (at parrotcode.org) for resp. bug reports, ok > > reports or nok reports. And since I don't think those addresses are > > set up... > Not yet. I'm nudging Ask regularly about this. But what sh

parrotbug working...

otbug" => prompts for questions and send TODO: - clean up / factorise code in send_msg - allow for user to review what will be sent - tests with various flavours of perl (and especially perl 5.005) - tests with various OS - change the flags set (and maybe use Getopt::Long) Leopold Toetsch

Re: [PATCH] parrotbug 0.0.1

Dan Sugalski wrote: > Since we need a new system to handle ok/nok/full bug reports, how > 'bout we add in: > >parrotstatus-ok >parrotstatus-nok >parrotbug > all @parrotcode.org. The first for automated OK reports, the second > for automated nok reports, and the third for actual bug repo

[PATCH] parrotbug 0.0.1

Hi there, Following Dan's warnocked demand, here's a first version of parrotbug: - it is very rough - it currently goes in parrot root dir - there is no embedded (pod) doc - it borrows heavily from perlbug - currently bug reports are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - it only accepts -ok / -nok fla

Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

chromatic wrote: > On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote: > > here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library. > > It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most > > important SDL functions directly available in PIR code. > Overall this looks good. [sni

anim_parrot_logo.imc: .include question + general imcc questions

Hello, While looking at Chromatic's anim_parrot_logo.imc (in examples/sdl), I was wondering why the includes weren't at the same place. Indeed, the source reads: .sub _main _init() _MAIN() end .end .include "library/sdl_types.imc" .pcc_sub _init prototyped .include "libr

Re: Some PIR "How do I?" questions

Dan Sugalski wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Jerome Quelin wrote: > > * How does one retrieve arguments given on the command-line? > > * How does one call a function? With arguments? With a variable > > number of arguments? Get the return value(s) of a sub? > > * How does

Re: Some PIR "How do I?" questions

Jerome Quelin wrote: > Melvin Smith wrote: > > I just checked in an intial IMCC faq (parrot/imcc/docs/imcfaq.pod) > Great job. Attached you'll find some corrections for typos. And of course I forgot the patch file. Here it is. Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Some PIR "How do I?" questions

Melvin Smith wrote: > I just checked in an intial IMCC faq (parrot/imcc/docs/imcfaq.pod) Great job. Attached you'll find some corrections for typos. > The FAQ is small, but it at least answers all of the above. As I see it, the faq will grow fast... Maybe we'll have to split it in different pa

Re: [imcc] objects speed, .include and file-scoped vars, and various stuff

Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - will objects introduce a speed overhead? > For sure, but not a big one. You can AFAIK obtain an integer index > for an attribute or method so its basically an array lookup. Nice. So maybe I'll go fo

[imcc] objects speed, .include and file-scoped vars, and various stuff

Hi there, Since objects are closing in, I begin to work on the new version of Befunge, that will be written in imcc. Anyway, whatever the reason, I'm playing with imcc and have some questions about it: - will objects introduce a speed overhead? I'm asking this question because the Lahey spac

Re: ponie-dev list

Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > We setup a development list for ponie. > email >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > to subscribe. May I ask why ponie doesn't use the p6i ml since as I see it, it's another project for parrot and thus will use $PARROT/languages/ponie (or perl5 or whatever)? Jérôme -- [EMAIL PROT

Re: Parrot 0.0.10 freeze

Steve Fink wrote: > I'm assuming this will be 0.0.10 codename? > I could be persuaded to call it 0.1.0 codename? Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 0.1.0

Leon Brocard wrote: > It's been a while since 0.0.9 (errr, 20th Dec). A lot has changed > since then. Maybe it's time for a 0.1.0 release. What are we waiting > for? Dan said: "either exceptions or objects". Once we have one, we'll go to 0.1.0, and when the second will be implemented (order does

Re: Objects, methods, attributes, properties, and other related frobnitzes

Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 8:39 PM +0100 2/3/03, Jerome Quelin wrote: > >Dan Sugalski wrote: > >> *) Property: A named thing attached to an object. Properties are > >> global to the object and public--i.e. there's no implicit hiding, > >> namespaces, or wh

Re: Objects, methods, attributes, properties, and other related frobnitzes

Dan Sugalski wrote: > *) Property: A named thing attached to an object. Properties are > global to the object and public--i.e. there's no implicit hiding, > namespaces, or whatnot. There can be only one foo property on an > object, for example [...] > The interpreter must handle class hierarchy stu

Re: Compiling to Parrot

Dan Sugalski wrote: > If you follow the calling conventions, then yes you'll be able to > call python/ruby/perl/befunge routines from Lua code, and vice versa. No, you won't be able to call befunge routines from Lua, because: - befunge does not know how to define subroutines (at least befunge-93

Re: [perl #19610] [PATCH] New language support: Ook!

Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Jerome Quelin (via RT) wrote: > > - currently I'm just printing on stdout the resulting parrot code, > > I lack an eval instruction in Parrot. Dan, Leo? :-) > $ diff -ub ~/src/parrot/languages/ook/ook.pasm ook.pasm > --- /home/lt/src/parrot/l

Re: [perl #20315] [PATCH] eval

Leopold Toetsch wrote: > 1) > The call function to the compiler/assembler is kept as a NCI. Better > would be a subclass of NCI (Compiler.pmc or so), which provides > invoke_keyed(key, next) Hmm, I don't know what a NCI is. Where (which files) can I find information about them? Jerome -- [EMAI

Re: This week's Perl Summary

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Rafael Garcia-Suarez earned at least one giggle when he > suggested that we just needed "v~" "^~" and we had our > own flavour of Befunge. I promise: Lyon.pm does _not_ earn anything from Chris Pressey [0] in order to support Befunge! :-) Jerome [0] Chris Pressey is

Re: Objects, finally (try 1)

Dan Sugalski wrote: > and who's got > questions on how this works? (I can put together examples, but this > is pretty long as it is, and I think it's reasonably > self-explanatory. Besides, assembly language isn't generally the best > way to demonstrate anything... :) Well, as far as I'm concerned

[PASM] PerlHash and keys

Hi there, How can one retrieve the keys of a PerlHash in Parrot assembly? Is there a way to traverse a hash? Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #19610] [PATCH] New language support: Ook!

Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > - currently I'm just printing on stdout the resulting parrot code, > > I lack an eval instruction in Parrot. Dan, Leo? :-) > Here is the solution of our perl6 bootstrapping problem, I'll make an > I ops ... Nice to see how dummy languages make the whole stuff advance...

Re: cvs.perl.org?

Jerome Quelin wrote: > Is it me or cvs.perl.org isn't in the dns anymore? Never mind, my ISP dns should've been down for a moment. Everything is ok by now... Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs.perl.org?

Hey, Is it me or cvs.perl.org isn't in the dns anymore? $ cvs diff | tee lol.patch Unknown host cvs.perl.org. No comment, Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: parrot organization

On Mardi 3 Décembre 2002 23:24, Nicholas Clark wrote: > The perl foundation was able to provide some grants towards work on > this project and perl6. However, fund raising wasn't sufficient to > keep grants going full time. About two months ago, I asked the perl foundation about the grants, and K

[PASM] about pushi and popi

Hi, When I want to save all the integer registers, I'm using pushi, restoring them later with popi. When I'm doing a pushi, the old values of the registers are still present, but I'm wondering wether I can rely on this behavior, or if it's accidental and may be removed with another implementati

Re: Multiarray usage?

On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 19:02, you wrote: > > Speaking of limitations, what can hold a multiarray? Only integers, > > only strings, only pmc, a mix of everything? > Everything a list can hold (i.e. all above, but no mix), though it > would need a new class, which takes an list_type initializer

Re: Multiarray usage?

On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 17:18, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > Should I use something else to have arrays of arrays? > multiarrays are mainly intended for huge packed multi dim arrays. Then what should I use for a 2D array? > > ... What are the > > limitations of multiarrays? I've read in classe

Multiarray usage?

Hi, I'd like to use multi-arrays, but I can't understand how they're working. I looked at $PARROT/t/pmc/multiarray.t, but it's a bit obscure. Could you help me to understand them please? Or are they deprecated? Should I use something else to have arrays of arrays? What are the limitations of m

Directory renaming

Hi, Would it be possible to rename the $PARROT/languages/Befunge-93 directory into $PARROT/languages/befunge ? Indeed, as soon as parrot will support objects, I'll implement the befunge 98 specs, and the same interpreter will be able to interpret 93 ou 98 befunge code... I'm sorry, 'cause I

parrotcode.org?

I was surfing on parrotcode.org and saw it's not really up-to-date... At least, it still show version 0.0.7 as the current one. Maybe there are also others things to change? Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is Parrot in a stable state?

On Sunday 13 October 2002 12:16, Steve Fink wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote: > > FYI, I just rsync'ed this afternoon (12/10/2002 14:52 GMT) my Parrot, and > > did the traditionnal: perl Configure.pl ; make; make test > > and

Is Parrot in a stable state?

>From my point of view - it isn't. As I said in an earlier post, my Befunge interpreter is broken. It was doing well not so long ago. Anyway, since I wanted to add intlists and push/pop, I made some modifications. But I can't test them, since Parrot seems to be badly broken... At first, I tho

Re: Is Parrot in a stable state?

On Sunday 13 October 2002 12:11, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Jerome Quelin wrote: > > eq S0, "<", FLOW_GO_WEST > [ branch not taken ] > > And while I'm talking about strange things... Due to the fact that Parrot > > does not branch to the correct l

Re: popping an empty intlist

On Saturday 12 October 2002 17:56, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > So, what else can I do? Catching exceptions (is that possible with > > Parrot)? > Please have a look at list - not a PMC currently but can/does simulate > intlist now for testing. just compile/link list instead of intlist. > list_pop(..

Re: popping an empty intlist

On Saturday 12 October 2002 18:26, Brent Dax wrote: > # So, what else can I do? Catching exceptions (is that possible > # with Parrot)? > Not just yet. The ideas for exceptions are still bouncing around in the > caverns of Dan's brain. :^) So, what am I suppose to do? Is there a way to get the

popping an empty intlist

Hi there, I just discovered that: a) my befunge interpreter is broken (would you stop beaking it please? :o)) b) push and pop operations are now supported by lists c) there's a pmc for handling list of integers: intlist I'll get back to point a) later when I'll have investigated it. Point c)

Re: how to use MultiArray?

On Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 10:33, Josef Hook wrote : > I would really apreciate if someone would like to work on multiarrays. Okay, I volunteer for this, 'cause it's one of the things I really really need for my Befunge-98 interpreter. And everyone knows (or should know) that supporting Befunge

Re: [perl #17346] [PATCH] return undef for negative indices

On Dimanche 22 Septembre 2002 12:08, Nicholas Clark wrote : > (except by golfers and obfuscators. And several that I met at YAPC::EU are > excited by the golfing and obfuscating possibilities of perl6. Be afraid) As a golfer, I'm a bit disappointed by perl6's golfing possibilities. For several r

Re: [PATCH] chr support in Befunge interpreter.

On Lundi 9 Septembre 2002 21:44, Jerome Quelin wrote : > Attached is a patch for the Befunge interpreter: > - support of the chr instruction instead of Clinton's hack > - a Changes file Uh, cvs diff does not handle new files (and cvs add needs write access to the repository).

[PATCH] chr support in Befunge interpreter.

Attached is a patch for the Befunge interpreter: - support of the chr instruction instead of Clinton's hack - a Changes file Oh, btw, I'm now using cvs diff in order to create my patches (thanks Leon) - it rocks! I hope they are still valid patches. Jérôme -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: parro

Re: [perl #17035] [PATCH] chr support => strange behavior

On Dimanche 8 Septembre 2002 11:50, Peter Gibbs wrote : > This looks like a COW bug. Try the attached patch (untested). In fact, here's the minimal test case: $ cat p.pasm <" print I10 print "<\n" end EOF $ perl ../../assemble.pl p.pasm >P.pbc $ ../../parrot P.pbc >v< >97<

Re: [perl #17035] [PATCH] chr support => strange behavior

On Dimanche 8 Septembre 2002 11:28, Jerome Quelin wrote : > In fact, I tried to change S0, and whatever S0 value is (I tried with > several values: "<", ">", "A", "0", " "), I always get a 60 as its ordinal > value... I forgot t

Re: [perl #17035] [PATCH] chr support => strange behavior

On Jeudi 5 Septembre 2002 17:08, Dan Sugalski wrote : > At 3:04 PM + 9/5/02, Leon Brocard (via RT) wrote: > >I realise that proper Unicode support is coming, but it may be a while > >to get here. We currently have ord() and it makes sense to have a > >chr() as well, so that's what my patch pro

Parrot: maximizing the audience

Hi there, As a recent parroter, what striked me most while reading perl6-internals, is that it's very perl-centric. Ok, I agree that: * only Perl (and Larry) has planned its roadmap to include Parrot as its final virtual machine. * the name "perl6-internals" is really too restrictive (but th

Re: [PATCH] and yet another typo-cleaning pass on the pdd

On Dimanche 25 Août 2002 00:51, Tom Hughes wrote : > > Some typos corrected in the pdds. > Applied in part. I didn't apply all the changes to make the vtable method > descriptions describe what the method will do rather than what it does as > there doesn't seem to be any point to it. Well, I corr

Re: INP ("imcc's not parrot")

On Jeudi 22 Août 2002 04:59, 'John Porter' wrote : > And no one > has suggested that HLL compiler writers shoudl emit befunge. > Yet. :-) Since we're talking about this, I have a suggestion... :o) Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] bug in Befunge interpreter

Sorry guys, I was putting the blame on you when trying to load a file not properly newline-terminated, but it was *all my fault*. Here's the patch. Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urbN parrot.orig/languages/Befunge-93/README parrot/languages/Befunge-93/README --- parrot.orig/languages/Befung

[PATCH] comments in t/pmc/perlarray.t

Not very useful, but will reflect the truth. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 345c345 < # Make sure index zero is indeed 7 --- > # Make sure index zero is indeed -15 434c434 <# Make sure index zero is indeed 7 --- ># Make sure index zero is indeed -15 522c522 <# Make sur

[PATCH] new language supported by Parrot!

y well... + + +TODO + +* more error checking +* better rand()/chr() methods +* more tests (with Perl and Test::Harness) +* debugging options +* use an array of arrays instead of an array of strings +* implement Befunge 98 + + +AUTHOR +-- +Jerome Quelin, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + +ACK

[PATCH] new op in core.ops

Well, I don't know if this is interesting, but here's a patch that implement: op rand(out NUM) op rand(out NUM, in INT) and does what you can guess. There's also a test file (I don't know wether the tests should go in an existant test file). But, there is a tiny, little problem: I don't c

[PATCH] core.ops and pod

One should begin with slight updates.. :) So this patch is just about pod in core.ops (unbalanced =over / =back, and a missing blank line). Btw, how do you prefer me to send patch (as if I were able to send more patches... anyway...): plain text inside the mail or attached (such as this one)?

[PASM] PerlArray.length issue a warning

Hi, it's me again with my questions on pasm... I just downloaded the latest version of Parrot (it's currently 17:00 GMT). $ ./parrot -v [...] This is parrot version 0.0.7-devel built for i386-linux [...] $ cat test.pasm new P0, .PerlArray set P0[10], "foo" set I0, P0.length print I0 print "\n" $

[PASM] problem opening / reading file

Hi there, I'm rather new with Parrot, and I wanted to play with it a little. I'm playing with parrot 0.0.7, I did *not* fetch the last CVS version. I have a problem when I'm trying to read a file. I looked at parrot_assembly.pod and saw: open px, sy Open the file Y on filehan