On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:14:05PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Want to apply the bits you want, then? Or shall I commit the whole thing?
I've committed the whole thing for now, since Parrot segfaults without it. :)
--
Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:14:05PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >Adding undef to undef? Why bother? :)
>
> Who needs to initialize variables anyway? :)
>
> We need to add in some warning code, I think. I'll stub out an interface.
Exceptions of some kind would be nice too :)
--
Jason
At 08:06 PM 1/4/2002 +, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:57:29PM -0500, Jason Gloudon wrote:
> > This makes PerlUndef somewhat functional by adding logical,
> > arithmetic, and repeat methods.
>
>Cool, thanks.
Want to apply the bits you want, then? Or shall I commit the whole t
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:57:29PM -0500, Jason Gloudon wrote:
> This makes PerlUndef somewhat functional by adding logical,
> arithmetic, and repeat methods.
Cool, thanks.
> STRING* get_string () {
> - return NULL;
> + return string_make(INTERP,NULL,0,NULL,0,NULL);
> }
I did
This makes PerlUndef somewhat functional by adding logical,
arithmetic, and repeat methods.
Index: global_setup.c
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/global_setup.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 global_setup.c
--- global_
