> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:05:05 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> This is partially fixed now for `is equiv` with
> https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/f9f0883c6c and
> https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/75f42755ec
FYI: with 6.d prep going on, I reverted[^1] that test for now
Don't want to s
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:05:05 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> This is partially fixed now for `is equiv` with
> https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/f9f0883c6c and
> https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/75f42755ec
FYI: with 6.d prep going on, I reverted[^1] that test for now
Don't want to s
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:42:50 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> Per TimToady[^1], we should throw on attempts to use list assoc with
> non-infix ops.
From: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2018-01-12#i_15683344
14:16 masak re https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=132711 --
associat
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:42:50 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> Per TimToady[^1], we should throw on attempts to use list assoc with
> non-infix ops.
From: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2018-01-12#i_15683344
14:16 masak re https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=132711 --
associat
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:05:05 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> On prefix and postfix ops, using `is assoc('list')` causes an LTA
> error without any location.
>
> I've no idea if it makes sense for them to be assoc list; originally,
> I came across this while trying to make a postfix op `is
> equiv(
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #131099]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131099 >
On prefix and postfix ops, using `is assoc('list')` causes an LTA error without
any locat
