On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:31:28 -0800, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote:
> FWIW it never worked:
> https://gist.github.com/Whateverable/d9dbebb0e985a3964845df2c8652cbdf
>
> On 2017-11-27 17:36:22, comdog wrote:
> > I previously asked about this unexpected Z behavior on Stackoverflow
> > ( https://stack
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:31:28 -0800, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote:
> FWIW it never worked:
> https://gist.github.com/Whateverable/d9dbebb0e985a3964845df2c8652cbdf
>
> On 2017-11-27 17:36:22, comdog wrote:
> > I previously asked about this unexpected Z behavior on Stackoverflow
> > ( https://stack
FWIW it never worked:
https://gist.github.com/Whateverable/d9dbebb0e985a3964845df2c8652cbdf
On 2017-11-27 17:36:22, comdog wrote:
> I previously asked about this unexpected Z behavior on Stackoverflow
> ( https://stackoverflow.com/q/45001820/2766176 ).
>
> I expected this to change several hash ke
Curious sidenote:
when you use [Z+]= it will complain about "useless use of [Z+]= in sink
context" and the modifications actually go through. With Z[+=] - which
is probably the default parsing of this - it will not complain about
useless use, but it also won't Do The Thing.
Curious sidenote:
when you use [Z+]= it will complain about "useless use of [Z+]= in sink
context" and the modifications actually go through. With Z[+=] - which
is probably the default parsing of this - it will not complain about
useless use, but it also won't Do The Thing.
# New Ticket Created by "brian d foy"
# Please include the string: [perl #132511]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132511 >
I previously asked about this unexpected Z behavior on Stackoverflow
( https://stackover
