Dan~
Sounds good. I will start on that, but don't hold your breath as it
may take a little while. I will try to keep abreast of current CVS.
Matt
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:37:14 -0400, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:12 AM -0400 8/20/04, Matt Fowles wrote:
> >Dan~
> >
> >Just a fe
At 10:12 AM -0400 8/20/04, Matt Fowles wrote:
Dan~
Just a few small questions about scons to clarify...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:16:24 -0400, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whatever we use is fine as long as:
a) We can edit the dependency file without having to know the
language the tool'
Dan~
Just a few small questions about scons to clarify...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:16:24 -0400, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatever we use is fine as long as:
>
> a) We can edit the dependency file without having to know the
> language the tool's written in
I believe that scons wil
At 8:29 AM -0700 8/18/04, Dave Whipp wrote:
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rather not. Python is AFAIK not as portable as Perl. But there is a Perl
based make somewhere, the named just escaped my mind.
We use Makepp (http://makepp.sourceforge.net/) h
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Rather not. Python is AFAIK not as portable as Perl. But there is a Perl
> based make somewhere, the named just escaped my mind.
We use Makepp (http://makepp.sourceforge.net/) here. Written in Perl, its
particular stre
Simon Wistow wrote:
Leopold Toetsch said:
Rather not. Python is AFAIK not as portable as Perl. But there is a Perl
based make somewhere, the named just escaped my mind.
It's called Cons. I can't remember whether Cons or Scons came first
(ah, Cons was the orginal http://www.scons.org/faq.html#SS_6
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:21:22AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch said:
> Rather not. Python is AFAIK not as portable as Perl. But there is a Perl
> based make somewhere, the named just escaped my mind.
It's called Cons. I can't remember whether Cons or Scons came first
(ah, Cons was the orginal http://
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All~
> I was thinking about reworking the Parrot build system to use scons
> (http://www.scons.org/). The up side to this is that it would allow
> more precise dependecies and could probably be used to eliminate the
> configure step. The down side is that
All~
I was thinking about reworking the Parrot build system to use scons
(http://www.scons.org/). The up side to this is that it would allow
more precise dependecies and could probably be used to eliminate the
configure step. The down side is that it introduces another
dependency. However, scon
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #31138]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31138 >
Short term, fix the dependencies (eg, more needs to depend on classes/*)
(From th
10 matches
Mail list logo
