On Wednesday 09 May 2007 07:21:44 Andy Dougherty wrote:
> [appending to an old ticket, since if anyone wants to ever get this
> working again, they'll probably have to fix up the blind guesses I made in
> that old patch too.]
Thanks, applied as r18562 (er, oops -- r18561, due to an excruciatingly
[appending to an old ticket, since if anyone wants to ever get this
working again, they'll probably have to fix up the blind guesses I made in
that old patch too.]
diff -r -u parrot-current/src/jit/sun4/jit_emit.h
parrot-andy/src/jit/sun4/jit_emit.h
--- parrot-current/src/jit/sun4/jit_emit.h
On Dec 6, 2005, at 16:40, Andy Dougherty wrote:
... The structure of the jit_emit.h file is hard to fathom -- it gets
included multiple times by multiple files, and different
implementations
in the jit/*/ directories handle those multiple includes differently.
Yep. Therefore jit/skeleton/ji
fcc, cond, annul, disp)
/* This function loads a value */
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@
Parrot_jit_bytejump(jit_info, interpreter, emitm_o(0));
}
-#undef Parrot_jit_restart_op
+# undef Parrot_jit_restart_op
void Parrot_jit_restart_op(Parrot_jit_info_t *jit_info,
Interp * interp
On Dec 5, 2005, at 18:28, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Can you provide dummy subs for the _offs functions and put in a dummy
define for the get_base_reg_no macro that returns some valid register
number.
I'll try something, but it'll be nearly blin
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2005, at 19:59, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
>
> > Parrot_jit_emit_mov_mr_offs blib/lib/libparrot.a(jit.o)
> > Parrot_jit_emit_get_base_reg_no blib/lib/libparrot.a(jit.o)
> > Parrot_jit_emit_mov_mr_n_offs blib/li
On Dec 2, 2005, at 19:59, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
Parrot_jit_emit_mov_mr_offs blib/lib/libparrot.a(jit.o)
Parrot_jit_emit_get_base_reg_no blib/lib/libparrot.a(jit.o)
Parrot_jit_emit_mov_mr_n_offs blib/lib/libparrot.a(jit.o)
Parrot_jit_emit_mov_rm_offs blib/lib/l
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #37819]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37819 >
With both Sun's cc and gcc, builds of parrot on the sun4 architecture now
fail with:
