On 5/8/07, Mark Glines via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat May 05 09:37:44 2007, particle wrote:
> On 5/4/07, via RT Mark Glines at
parrotcode.org> wrote:
> > * Standardize on PARROT_*_GUARD style names for these lines (some
> > headers used a style that looks like "__PIRLEXER_H" instead)
On Sat May 05 09:37:44 2007, particle wrote:
> On 5/4/07, via RT Mark Glines at
parrotcode.org> wrote:
> > * Standardize on PARROT_*_GUARD style names for these lines (some
> > headers used a style that looks like "__PIRLEXER_H" instead)
> >
> there's a problem here... compilers/imcc/pirlexer.h is
Mark Glines schrieb:
* Fix up the indentation problems caused by the above bullet point.
(TODO: why does t/codingstd/c_indent.t require indentation for #if
and #ifdef, but not for #ifndef?)
As far as I understand c_indent.t, #ifndef is also covered
Except that it isn't. If you app
On Sat, 05 May 2007 07:58:45 -0700
"Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Fix up the indentation problems caused by the above bullet point.
> > (TODO: why does t/codingstd/c_indent.t require indentation for #if
> > and #ifdef, but not for #ifndef?)
> As far as I understand c
Jerry Gay via RT schrieb:
On 5/4/07, via RT Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Standardize on PARROT_*_GUARD style names for these lines (some
headers used a style that looks like "__PIRLEXER_H" instead)
It looks like the __FOO_H convention was only used in compilers/pirc.
There a
On 5/4/07, via RT Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Standardize on PARROT_*_GUARD style names for these lines (some
headers used a style that looks like "__PIRLEXER_H" instead)
there's a problem here... compilers/imcc/pirlexer.h is a *generated*
header file. next time somebody runs C
to
