Nicholas Clark writes:
> Also, I'm never totally confident on what isn't quite undefined behaviour in
> C, but something like
>
> $a = $b + ++$b;
>
> doesn't appear to have multiple side effects, yet it ought to be undefined.
It is undefined in C. The standard says that between any adjacent p
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:18:50PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Is it defined that $a + $b evaluates the arguments in any particular order?
> Even guaranteeing that either the left or the right gets completely evaluated
> first would be better than C :-)
In C, that is deliberately left undefined
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:59:59AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +As in C, these operators increment or decrement the object in question
> +either before or after the value is taken from the object, depending on
> +whether it is put before or after. Also as in C, use of multiple side
> +effec
Author: larry
Date: Sat Jan 27 00:59:58 2007
New Revision: 13540
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Major reorganization of S03.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
