Re: [tutorial] pct tutorial language: Squaak implementation

2008-03-25 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
after reading this tutorial you shouldn't have too much trouble implementing SmallTalk (SmallSquawk?) :-) the only issue is to find a proper grammar to stick with; effectively all statements are PAST::Op( :pasttype('call') ) or :pasttype('callmethod') (depending on your implementation, I think the

Re: [tutorial] pct tutorial language: Squaak implementation

2008-03-25 Thread Eric Hanchrow
> "Mark" == Mark J Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> ... confusion with Squeak, which is how I read this subject Mark> at first. ("Smalltalk on Parrot?! Whoa!). But maybe Mark> that's just me. :) I read it that way too (and had the same reaction :-) -- [T]he main reason

Re: [tutorial] pct tutorial language: Squaak implementation

2008-03-25 Thread Mark J. Reed
If I may make a humble suggestion, it seems that using the English spelling "squawk" would, besides matching the English name "parrot" better, also avoid any confusion with Squeak, which is how I read this subject at first. ("Smalltalk on Parrot?! Whoa!). But maybe that's just me. :) On 3/25/08