Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed]

2001-09-07 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Friday 07 September 2001 11:08 pm, Sterin, Ilya wrote: > Actually there were some tests done, can't recall where now, though by a > trusted source. I will be digging it up in my email and emailing it to the > list. There were a few languages tested including Perl, C, C++, Java > (can't remembe

RE: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed]

2001-09-07 Thread Sterin, Ilya
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed] > > > hi, > > I see that it was mentioned that Perl5 is fast than Java, Python > etc... and > was wondering is there

Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed]

2001-09-07 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 05:54 PM 9/7/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: >On Friday 07 September 2001 05:51 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > >(Like > > >Unicode Everywhere). > > > > Who's doing that? We're keeping things in native format as much as we can. > >If one of our stated goals is Unicode support (even for the sour

Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed]

2001-09-07 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Friday 07 September 2001 05:51 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >(Like > >Unicode Everywhere). > > Who's doing that? We're keeping things in native format as much as we can. If one of our stated goals is Unicode support (even for the source itself - that's what I meant by "everywhere": source, input

Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed]

2001-09-07 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 05:41 PM 9/7/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: >On Friday 07 September 2001 05:38 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > > As for perl 6 vs perl 5, that's reasonably easy. We benchmark things on > > perl 5.004_04 and 6.x, and see who wins. If 6 doesn't, we find out why and > > speed it up. :) > >5.004

Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed]

2001-09-07 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Friday 07 September 2001 05:38 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > As for perl 6 vs perl 5, that's reasonably easy. We benchmark things on > perl 5.004_04 and 6.x, and see who wins. If 6 doesn't, we find out why and > speed it up. :) 5.004? (Is that where the big drop-off begins?) You are going to t

Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed]

2001-09-07 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:30 PM 9/7/2001 +0300, raptor wrote: >I see that it was mentioned that Perl5 is fast than Java, Python etc... and >was wondering is there any comparison how-much, if ? and if why ? and if we >know the reason can we exploit it further ... and similar... >And does really Perl6 will be faster..

Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter [speed]

2001-09-07 Thread raptor
hi, I see that it was mentioned that Perl5 is fast than Java, Python etc... and was wondering is there any comparison how-much, if ? and if why ? and if we know the reason can we exploit it further ... and similar... And does really Perl6 will be faster. how much u expect ? Thanx = iVAN