Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:25 PM 1/4/2002 -0600, David M. Lloyd wrote: >I don't know if this is related, but about an hour or two ago someone >committed something that caused 'make' to not include 'CFLAGS' in the >link phase, which causes 64-bit Solaris to not build properly. Should I >be setting an additional thingy

Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:19 AM 1/4/2002 -0800, Jason Diamond wrote: >The attached patch builds for me on Win32. After applying it, >re-Configure.pl and make to see if I screwed up the Unix builds. Works on Cygwin. Applied, thanks. Dan --

Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:25 PM 1/4/2002 -0600, David M. Lloyd wrote: >I don't know if this is related, but about an hour or two ago someone >committed something that caused 'make' to not include 'CFLAGS' in the >link phase, which causes 64-bit Solaris to not build properly. Should I >be setting an additional thingy

Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread David M. Lloyd
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Jason Diamond wrote: > > Okay, the problem is in the compiletestc in Configure.pl. Unfortunately > I'm > > not sure what's proper for this. If you could, take a look at hints/vms.pl > > for how to override the default compiletestc sub and add an override to > > hints/mswin32.p

Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Jason Diamond
> Okay, the problem is in the compiletestc in Configure.pl. Unfortunately I'm > not sure what's proper for this. If you could, take a look at hints/vms.pl > for how to override the default compiletestc sub and add an override to > hints/mswin32.pl? Or pass on the compile and link command lines tha

Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Dan Sugalski wrote: > not sure what's proper for this. If you could, take a look at > hints/vms.pl for how to override the default compiletestc sub and add > an override to hints/mswin32.pl? Or pass on the compile and link > command lines that're appropriate here and I'll wedge it in myself as

Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 06:29 PM 1/4/2002 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Gah. Visual studio, right? > > Right. Okay, the problem is in the compiletestc in Configure.pl. Unfortunately I'm not sure what's proper for this. If you could, take a look at hints/vms.pl for how to override the d

Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Dan Sugalski wrote: > Gah. Visual studio, right? Right. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/

Re: Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 06:06 PM 1/4/2002 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >test_gnuc.c >LINK : fatal error LNK1149: Output filename identical to input filename >"C:\home\parrot\test_siz.exe" identical >C compiler died! at configure.pl line 696. Gah. Visual studio, right? Dan

Current Makefile.pl fails on Win32

2002-01-04 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
C:\home\parrot>perl configure.pl --defaults Parrot Version 0.0.3 Configure Copyright (C) 2001-2002 Yet Another Society Since you're running this script, you obviously have Perl 5--I'll be pulling some defaults from its configuration. Checking the MANIFEST to make sure you have a complete Parrot