Gopal V wrote:
If memory serves me right, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
`PackFile_unpack: Bytecode not valid for this interpreter: version mismatch'
Ah, this one. s. "[perl #18072] [PATCH] fingerprinting the PBC" and an
early thread with the keyowrd "fingerprinting". Also mentioned in the
thread
If memory serves me right, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> The changes are 99.9% internal - all (parrot + perl6) tests are running
> during these changes.
Hmm... a .pbc I assembled last week refused to run today ... which was
really surprising for me ..
`PackFile_unpack: Bytecode not valid for this int
Gopal V wrote:
Hi All,
We've been thinking long and hard about Parrot and found that
the spec viz packfile versions , code segmentations, opcodes and
virtually everything is changing minute to minute ...
No specs are changing currently, but there is some discussion, how to
continue, how to
Hi All,
We've been thinking long and hard about Parrot and found that
the spec viz packfile versions , code segmentations, opcodes and
virtually everything is changing minute to minute ...
So we think it might do good to have a Parrot-dev'r do the
co-ordination duties . What I ha