On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:01:26AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> > I don't have time in the short term to work on the (albeit fairly
> > trivial) change to Storable. If someone can do that and get a new
> > release out then I'll look
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:01:26AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> I don't have time in the short term to work on the (albeit fairly
> trivial) change to Storable. If someone can do that and get a new
> release out then I'll look deeper into the performance issues then.
In reading this thread over the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:01:20PM -0700, Ovid wrote:
> --- Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'll look into SQLite.
> >
> > I'd caution against rushing in any particular direction without some
> > profiling information to back it up.
> >
> > Having said that, I'd strongly recommend swit
--- Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll look into SQLite.
>
> I'd caution against rushing in any particular direction without some
> profiling information to back it up.
>
> Having said that, I'd strongly recommend switching to Storable first.
> It did have problems but it's now very ro
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:38:48PM +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Tim Bunce wrote:
> > p.s. Could someone suggest a pure-perl module with lots of tests as
> > a suitable testbed for Devel::Cover?
>
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Acme-EyeDrops has 22 test programs,
> 769 tests and no dependencies.
Tim Bunce wrote:
> p.s. Could someone suggest a pure-perl module with lots of tests as
> a suitable testbed for Devel::Cover?
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Acme-EyeDrops has 22 test programs,
769 tests and no dependencies.
/-\
http://personals.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Personals
New people, new poss
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:05:38PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:34:38PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:16:40PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > I wrote "database" in quotes because currently we are talking about a
> > > flat file, written using D
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:10:51PM -0700, Ovid wrote:
> I'm trying to talk my boss into letting me poke into the internals of
> Devel::Cover more, but I doubt that will be approved. If it is, maybe
> I can work on this.
If you or anyone else does get to look at this the code should all be
locali
--- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Initially I wanted something with few, or better yet no dependencies. I
> also wanted something that required little or no work when I changed the
> internal data structures.
Well, SQLite fails the first and *might* fail on the second. On the other h
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:34:38PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:16:40PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > I wrote "database" in quotes because currently we are talking about a
> > flat file, written using Data::Dumper and eval'd in. I have considered
> > other options - spec
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:16:40PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I wrote "database" in quotes because currently we are talking about a
> flat file, written using Data::Dumper and eval'd in. I have considered
> other options - specifically YAML and Storable. I have found YAML to be
> even slower an
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:24:14PM -0700, Ovid wrote:
> --- Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, still it would be good to improve the speed of Devel::Cover,
> > on my box (lowly 500 Mhz, yes, I could upgrade to 2 Ghz AMD or so :)
> > a particulary project takes 33 minutes for one run... not e
--- Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, still it would be good to improve the speed of Devel::Cover, on my box
> (lowly 500 Mhz, yes, I could upgrade to 2 Ghz AMD or so :) a particulary
> project takes 33 minutes for one run... not exactly what I call "interactive"
> :)
Frankly, I think some m
13 matches
Mail list logo