On Dec 4, 2005, at 1:18, Bob Rogers wrote:
Sorry; I remember reading this now. Please accept the following small
patch to close the documentation gap.
NP and thanks - applied r10336
leo
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:50:00 +0100
On Dec 3, 2005, at 20:15, Bob Rogers wrote:
> Excellent; thank you -- and for the other fix especially. But now I
> notice that this is what happens if you put the inner sub first:
Yes. That's what
On Dec 3, 2005, at 20:15, Bob Rogers wrote:
Excellent; thank you -- and for the other fix especially. But now I
notice that this is what happens if you put the inner sub first:
Yes. That's what I've written in:
http://groups.google.com/group/perl.perl6.internals/browse_frm/thread/
812c0e2a
On 12/3/05, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, at present, lexical subs must be emitted in preorder. Is this a
> bug, a TODO, or a conscious design decision? (I'm hoping for "bug,"
> BTW, since it's not mentioned in PDD20 . . . )
>
i've added 4 tests to t/op/lexicals.t testing this. as i
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:40:31 +0100
On Dec 3, 2005, at 3:54, Bob Rogers wrote:
>In rev 10317, parrot segfaults if the sub named in ":outer" is not
> defined in the current compilation unit. The patch fixes the symptom,
> and adds a
On Dec 3, 2005, at 3:54, Bob Rogers wrote:
In rev 10317, parrot segfaults if the sub named in ":outer" is not
defined in the current compilation unit. The patch fixes the symptom,
and adds a test. (But the error message could be improved.)
Thanks, applied - r10320
leo
In rev 10317, parrot segfaults if the sub named in ":outer" is not
defined in the current compilation unit. The patch fixes the symptom,
and adds a test. (But the error message could be improved.)
-- Bob Rogers
