Re: Parrot vs .NET

2001-11-15 Thread Benoit Cerrina
> Yes, maybe... but they show many functional and scripting languages > working, like Haskell, ML, Python and Perl... but that's not the point. Yes you can do it and you can also do it on the jvm but they are slow... With the clr I think its not as bad as with the jvm though. Benoit

Re: Parrot vs .NET

2001-11-15 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 01:36 PM 11/15/2001 +, Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes wrote: > I had a conference about .NET and, what a surprise... this big > title is >only another virtual machine. Yup. We've all just got a bad case of hardware envy. :) >I don't know what .MONO is trying to do, They're trying

Re: Parrot vs .NET

2001-11-15 Thread Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 02:36:54PM +, Simon Cozens wrote: | On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 01:36:34PM +, Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes wrote: | > I had a conference about .NET and, what a surprise... this big title is | > only another virtual machine. I don't know what .MONO is trying to do,

Re: Parrot vs .NET

2001-11-15 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 01:36:34PM +, Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes wrote: > I had a conference about .NET and, what a surprise... this big title is > only another virtual machine. I don't know what .MONO is trying to do, but > isn't Parrot something like .NET, and usable that way? Ther

Parrot vs .NET

2001-11-15 Thread Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes
Hello! I had a conference about .NET and, what a surprise... this big title is only another virtual machine. I don't know what .MONO is trying to do, but isn't Parrot something like .NET, and usable that way? Cheers, and continue parroting :) Alberto -- f u cn