On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:33:54AM -0800, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
> I'm wondering if I'm the only one who would love to see
> Devel::Cover::Regex? Many (most?) perl programs are pretty regex
> heavy, and if we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that each
> regex is actually a program
> I'm wondering if I'm the only one who would love to see
> Devel::Cover::Regex? [...] I think this would be a very useful
> extension to Devel::Cover, although I imagine that it's pretty tricky
> to do. Even figuring out how to display the results might be tough
> to do well.
It's not a solution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 20:33, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
> I'm wondering if I'm the only one who would love to see
> Devel::Cover::Regex? Many (most?) perl programs are pretty regex
> heavy, and if we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that ea
I'm wondering if I'm the only one who would love to see
Devel::Cover::Regex? Many (most?) perl programs are pretty regex
heavy, and if we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that each
regex is actually a program in itself. You can try to throw lots of
inputs at it and hope that you we