Re: Pipe dream - Devel::Cover::Regex

2004-12-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:33:54AM -0800, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote: > I'm wondering if I'm the only one who would love to see > Devel::Cover::Regex? Many (most?) perl programs are pretty regex > heavy, and if we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that each > regex is actually a program

Re: Pipe dream - Devel::Cover::Regex

2004-12-07 Thread mjcarman
> I'm wondering if I'm the only one who would love to see > Devel::Cover::Regex? [...] I think this would be a very useful > extension to Devel::Cover, although I imagine that it's pretty tricky > to do. Even figuring out how to display the results might be tough > to do well. It's not a solution

Re: Pipe dream - Devel::Cover::Regex

2004-12-07 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Tuesday 07 December 2004 20:33, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote: > I'm wondering if I'm the only one who would love to see > Devel::Cover::Regex? Many (most?) perl programs are pretty regex > heavy, and if we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that ea

Pipe dream - Devel::Cover::Regex

2004-12-07 Thread Kevin Scaldeferri
I'm wondering if I'm the only one who would love to see Devel::Cover::Regex? Many (most?) perl programs are pretty regex heavy, and if we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that each regex is actually a program in itself. You can try to throw lots of inputs at it and hope that you we