Re: .HL_language pragma (was: Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond.)

2005-03-07 Thread MrJoltCola
At 07:50 AM 3/7/2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Roger Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:01 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >> 4.1.1) implement a language pragma in assembler, e.g.: >> >> .HL_language Python Sounds good to me except that I would prefer you remove the HL_ and

.HL_language pragma (was: Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond.)

2005-03-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Roger Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:01 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >> 4.1.1) implement a language pragma in assembler, e.g.: >> >> .HL_language Python > A pragma like that seems to split high-level languages into two groups: > those that are specially known to p

Re: Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond.

2005-03-07 Thread Roger Browne
es, and would create a BirdCharacter if the calling language was "Bird", but would create a PyInt if the calling language was "Python". I hope this makes some sense, and that you can see some merit in it. > Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond. I'd be

Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond.

2005-03-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Below inline/attached is a proposal for Parrot core changes. I'll post a more detailed proposal for 1) objects in a minute. leo Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond. These are numbered just for reference but are else in no particular order. A lot can be done in parallel.