Re: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-03 Thread Erik Lechak
Thanks for the feedback, Pod it is! I will get back to work on the "getting started" guide. Thanks again, Erik

Re: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:59 PM -0400 10/2/02, Erik Lechak wrote: > By the way is this an RFC thing? Well, changes to POD as far as perl is concerned is probably a RFC thing, but I don't think I'd bother--I know Larry and Damian have some stuff up their sleeves for POD, heredocs, and suchlike things. > Should t

Re: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-02 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:26:53AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote: > I don't like Java that much (for many reasons), but I have nothing but > respect for the massive amount of documentation that is easily accessible as > a direct result of JavaDoc. I personnaly feel that it greatly helped java > achiev

Re: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-02 Thread Tanton Gibbs
> I disagree. > > I don't like Java that much (for many reasons), but I have nothing but > respect for the massive amount of documentation that is easily accessible as > a direct result of JavaDoc. I personnaly feel that it greatly helped java > achieve the success it has. If all of parrot's mod

RE: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-02 Thread Matt Fowles
> but since it is the norm, then I think we should stick with it. > - Original Message - > From: "Erik Lechak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "perl6-internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent

Re: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-02 Thread Sean O'Rourke
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Erik Lechak wrote: > I'm looking at it right now. Thanks for the link. This is the first > time I have heard of doxygen. I meant the pointer at least partly as a reminder that this is one wheel we shouldn't have to reinvent. I think there are plenty of solutions out there t

Re: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-02 Thread Tanton Gibbs
rik Lechak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "perl6-internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:59 PM Subject: Re: Self documenting comments for parrot > Sean O'Rourke wrote: > >

Re: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-02 Thread Erik Lechak
Sean O'Rourke wrote: >Have you had a chance to look at doxygen? It doesn't support Perl, but >Perl is on the todo list, and (at least a couple of years ago) its C++ >support was pretty impressive. > >http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/ > >/s > > > I'm looking at it right now. Thanks for t

Re: Self documenting comments for parrot

2002-10-02 Thread Sean O'Rourke
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Erik Lechak wrote: > I was wondering if you could take a look at it and tell me if it has any > merrit, or if I should not waste my time on it and get back to the > "getting started guide". Have you had a chance to look at doxygen? It doesn't support Perl, but Perl is on the