On 27 May 2005, at 18:25, Ovid wrote:
--- Ian Langworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reflecting upon this, I'm not even sure why I'd want argument
modification as a feature. (Maybe I still had Hook::LexWrap on the
brain.) I might just take this out.
I vote for taking it out. I view contract
On 27 May 2005, at 16:21, Ian Langworth wrote:
[snip]
When you say "automatic," I think of source filtering. Do you simply
mean an alias for the first argument? If so, I think it's best to
leave that up to the programmer. You can always use shift.
Fair enough. I just hate having the duplicatio
On 5/27/05, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Class::Agreement's contracts should be
> > nearly as light as putting "die unless" in your methods.
>
> What? I had no idea. Was that in the docs and I overlooked it? To
> me, this is probably one of the strongest features of Class::Agreement
> a
--- Ian Langworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reflecting upon this, I'm not even sure why I'd want argument
> modification as a feature. (Maybe I still had Hook::LexWrap on the
> brain.) I might just take this out.
I vote for taking it out. I view contracts to be similar to exceptions
in one res
On 5/26/05, Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -No class invariants?
Soon!
> -You do mention that tweaking @_ in the pre/post blocks will
> affect the @_ passed to the method. You don't say that having pre/
> posts that have side effects is evil. You probably should :-)
Reflecti
On 23 May 2005, at 15:33, Ian Langworth wrote:
I'm working on a new module, Class::Agreement, and I've started by
writing the documentation. If anyone has a few minutes, I'd like some
feedback as to whether my descriptions of the concepts make sense and
if you like the syntax.
HTML: http://re
On 5/23/05, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In discussing the benefits, I didn't think you made a strong argument.
> However, in reading the page your docs points to, I think the argument
> can be improved with this:
>
> Precondition violations mean that the client
> is in error. Postcondit
--- Ian Langworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a new module, Class::Agreement, and I've started by
> writing the documentation. If anyone has a few minutes, I'd like some
> feedback as to whether my descriptions of the concepts make sense and
> if you like the syntax.
>
> HTML: ht
I'm working on a new module, Class::Agreement, and I've started by
writing the documentation. If anyone has a few minutes, I'd like some
feedback as to whether my descriptions of the concepts make sense and
if you like the syntax.
HTML: http://reliant.langworth.com/~ian/Class-Agreement.html
P
