Re: RT#31859, Plain ole Hash

2004-12-18 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Sam Ruby wrote: Any objections to the NCI methods being removed from Coroutine(next), Hash(fromkeys), Iterator(next), and PerlHash(fromkeys) now? The fromkeys in Hash and PerlHash can be removed. The .next methods in iterable PMCs will be needed generally. But iterators need some rework still, e

Re: RT#31859, Plain ole Hash

2004-12-17 Thread Sam Ruby
Leopold Toetsch wrote: - The NCI method has an implementation in Hash and in PerlHash, this is not nice The NCI method is automatically inherited from Hash. But as it's a python method it'll be removed from Hash anyway. Any objections to the NCI methods being removed from Coroutine(next), Hash(fro

Re: RT#31859, Plain ole Hash

2004-12-13 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > The PerlHash is now an extension of Hash. Great, thanks. > The semantics should not have changed. For example, integer values are > still stored as PerlInt PMCs in the Hash PMC. I'd propose the following: * instead of PerlInt an Integer PM

RT#31859, Plain ole Hash

2004-12-13 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
Hi, I have responded to the ticket, http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=31859, but the response hasn't made if to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a policy, which responses to RT tickets are posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know that it works fine for new tickets. A patch for moving the implementation o