Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "K Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: Compiling to Parrot
At 5:01 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
>well, I think not, then I can't help it. What do you thin
ly IMCC in between).
thanks to the people who suggested/replied on my posting.
Regards
Klaas-Jan
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "K Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:05 PM
All~
It occurs to me that no one has mentioned ML. ML would be a pretty good
language to compile to parrot, and has reasonably strong usage in academic
circle...
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: K Stol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PR
I lost the original mail asking for suggestions, so there is no quoted
text here, but have you looked at Joy
(http://www.latrobe.edu.au/philosophy/phimvt/joy.html). Looks to be quite
clean and simple. I haven't had the time to delve into it, but when I was
reminded of it on the Ruby list, I t
At 11:43 PM -0800 1/21/03, Paul Du Bois wrote:
The advantage of Lua (at least for my project, which is a game) is that it
is quite easy to embed, and quite easy to customize. The C API is small and
easily understandable (at the expense of being a little bit of a pain to
use), and the internals ar
nvironment.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "K Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Compiling to Parrot
At 5:13 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
>Only thi
At 8:54 AM -0500 1/21/03, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:41:47AM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
Speaking of games, it would be interesting to see Parrot be used in that
direction. A lot of games currently are pretty much developed along the
lines of 'custom scripting langu
The advantage of Lua (at least for my project, which is a game) is that it
is quite easy to embed, and quite easy to customize. The C API is small and
easily understandable (at the expense of being a little bit of a pain to
use), and the internals are simple and quite malleable. The language itse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 07:16 am, Simon Wistow wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 12:14:29PM +0100, K Stol said:
> > LUA seems to be a very nice language, but how is this language to be
> > used? Is it in combination with a C program one would write?
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:41:47AM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Speaking of games, it would be interesting to see Parrot be used in that
> direction. A lot of games currently are pretty much developed along the
> lines of 'custom scripting language interfaced to custom game engine'
One of the reas
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> If you follow the calling conventions, then yes you'll be able to
> call python/ruby/perl/befunge routines from Lua code, and vice versa.
No, you won't be able to call befunge routines from Lua, because:
- befunge does not know how to define subroutines (at least befunge-93
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Compiling to Parrot
> At 5:13 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
> >Only thing I need to know before I can start is: what would the purpose
be
> >of a Lua to Parrot compiler? Lua is originally an embedded langua
At 5:13 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
Only thing I need to know before I can start is: what would the purpose be
of a Lua to Parrot compiler? Lua is originally an embedded language for
easy-scripting, as far as I understand. How could it be used when targeted
to parrot? Would it be possible to c
OTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: Compiling to Parrot
> At 5:01 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
> >well, I think not, then I can't help it. What do you think about
compiling
> >Lua to parrot (IMCC)?
>
> I like the idea, and I don't thi
At 5:01 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
well, I think not, then I can't help it. What do you think about compiling
Lua to parrot (IMCC)?
I like the idea, and I don't think you'll see anyone else tackle it
for a while. (And if that falls through, there's always LISP... :)
From: "Dan Sugalski" <
well, I think not, then I can't help it. What do you think about compiling
Lua to parrot (IMCC)?
Klaas-Jan
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "K Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January
At 4:46 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
Well, I'd do it as a project for my Bachelor's, so I won't get permission to
do such a project, if it already exists.
Ah, that could be a problem. Will it be a problem if you start a
project that someone else later also starts?
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMA
If memory serves me right, Leon Brocard wrote:
> An interesting project to do would be to do a Java->Parrot compiler.
Hmm... I think with the current Parrot setup that might be a bit difficult.
We need object instructions for that , also I need to be able to define
classes,interfaces and all the J
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: Compiling to Parrot
> At 9:17 AM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >
> >A few weeks ago I posted something about a Tcl->parrot compiler, but
> >Will Coleda already was working on such a proje
At 9:17 AM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
Hi there,
A few weeks ago I posted something about a Tcl->parrot compiler, but
Will Coleda already was working on such a project. It would be a as
a final project for my bachelor's. But because such already exists,
I'm looking for something else.
If you
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 12:14:29PM +0100, K Stol said:
> PHP is especially used in web pages. Would there be any advantage to have a
> PHP->Parrot compiler?
Depends what you mean by 'advantage'.
Currently, as far as I know, PHP runs on a virtual machine, just like
Perl so it's a good candidate f
uesday, January 21, 2003 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: Compiling to Parrot
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:17:56AM +0100, K Stol said:
> > A few weeks ago I posted something about a Tcl->parrot compiler, but
Will Coleda already was working on such a project. It would be a as a final
project for my bach
K Stol sent the following bits through the ether:
> A few weeks ago I posted something about a Tcl->parrot compiler, but
> Will Coleda already was working on such a project. It would be a as a
> final project for my bachelor's. But because such already exists, I'm
> looking for something else.
An
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:17:56AM +0100, K Stol said:
> A few weeks ago I posted something about a Tcl->parrot compiler, but Will Coleda
>already was working on such a project. It would be a as a final project for my
>bachelor's. But because such already exists, I'm looking for something else.
24 matches
Mail list logo