Leon Brocard wrote:
Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
>
Objects please!
I would second that. I would prefer a cool release to a cool date ;-)
Harry Jackson
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 3:29 PM
Subject: Objects and time
> Okay, I've just trodden on one of the nasty bits of objects, proper
> ordering of classes for initialization and destruction in the f
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 05:09 PM 2/23/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> >WRT feature freeze: I'd say: Starting from Tue, 24th 8.00 GMT no more
> >feature patches *should* go in, *except* objects.
>
> Basically that means: everyone will get really quiet and we will all w
At 05:09 PM 2/23/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
WRT feature freeze: I'd say: Starting from Tue, 24th 8.00 GMT no more
feature patches *should* go in, *except* objects.
Basically that means: everyone will get really quiet and we will all watch
Dan. >:)
-Melvin
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, the question--shall we do objects and maybe miss the Feb 29th
> release, or do the Feb 29th release and do objects for the next
> release? As I think I'm only a little while off (maybe a day or so)
> from getting it working,
Don't post intermediate st
At 10:29 AM 2/23/2004 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
So, the question--shall we do objects and maybe miss the Feb 29th release,
or do the Feb 29th release and do objects for the next release? As I think
I'm only a little while off (maybe a day or so) from getting it working,
I'm tempted to take a mi
Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
> So, the question--shall we do objects and maybe miss the Feb 29th
> release, or do the Feb 29th release and do objects for the next
> release?
Objects please!
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
scri
