RE: SAPI (Was RE: args, argv in parrot?)

2001-12-04 Thread Wizard
> perl -e '' > is very essential; though I could see a compatibility mode being > enabled by > default with '-e' if necessary. But perl is not parrot, and parrot doesn't need -e (unless we expect people to write one-liners in actual bytecode). Perl will be sitting on top of parrot, so it will

Re: SAPI (Was RE: args, argv in parrot?)

2001-12-04 Thread Michael L Maraist
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 12:21 am, David M. Lloyd wrote: > He was telling me about the way PHP seperates the interpreter from > the OS-specific stuff via a SAPI layer. Facinating, but perl is, afterall a scripting language first. perl -e '' is very essential; though I could see a compati

SAPI (Was RE: args, argv in parrot?)

2001-12-03 Thread David M. Lloyd
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I'm getting tempted to have some sort of multi-level ENV thing that, for > most single-interpreter cases, collapses down to a plain getenv/putenv. On a related topic, I have a friend/coworker who's an avid developer of PHP, and we routinely get into, sha