Thanks for the feedback,
Pod it is!
I will get back to work on the "getting started" guide.
Thanks again,
Erik
At 11:59 PM -0400 10/2/02, Erik Lechak wrote:
> By the way is this an RFC thing?
Well, changes to POD as far as perl is concerned is probably a RFC
thing, but I don't think I'd bother--I know Larry and Damian have
some stuff up their sleeves for POD, heredocs, and suchlike things.
> Should t
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:26:53AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> I don't like Java that much (for many reasons), but I have nothing but
> respect for the massive amount of documentation that is easily accessible as
> a direct result of JavaDoc. I personnaly feel that it greatly helped java
> achiev
> I disagree.
>
> I don't like Java that much (for many reasons), but I have nothing but
> respect for the massive amount of documentation that is easily accessible
as
> a direct result of JavaDoc. I personnaly feel that it greatly helped java
> achieve the success it has. If all of parrot's mod
; Cc: perl6-internals
> Subject: Re: Self documenting comments for parrot
>
>
> I hate to say this, but I'm still in favor of POD. It has all of the
> functionality required
> and is the official commenting style of parrot and perl. I
> personally find
> POD distasteful,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Erik Lechak wrote:
> I'm looking at it right now. Thanks for the link. This is the first
> time I have heard of doxygen.
I meant the pointer at least partly as a reminder that this is one wheel
we shouldn't have to reinvent. I think there are plenty of solutions out
there t
rik Lechak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "perl6-internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: Self documenting comments for parrot
> Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>
>
Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>Have you had a chance to look at doxygen? It doesn't support Perl, but
>Perl is on the todo list, and (at least a couple of years ago) its C++
>support was pretty impressive.
>
>http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/
>
>/s
>
>
>
I'm looking at it right now. Thanks for t
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Erik Lechak wrote:
> I was wondering if you could take a look at it and tell me if it has any
> merrit, or if I should not waste my time on it and get back to the
> "getting started guide".
Have you had a chance to look at doxygen? It doesn't support Perl, but
Perl is on the
Hi,
I asked a while ago if a "getting started manual" was a good idea. But
I got caught up on another issue, the format. I spent a couple of days
throwing together this demo of a self documenting comment style that can
be used in perl and c without the compiler freaking out. It also works
10 matches
Mail list logo