> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:28:45PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> I think even better than
>
> ok( $expr, "name" );
>
> or
>
> ok( $expr, "comment" );
>
> is
>
> ok( $expr, "label" );
>
> RJBS points out that "comment" implies "not really worth doing", and I
> still don't like "name" be
I don't really agree that "comment" implies "not really worth doing". I
think
those inclined to not put a name/comment/label on their test will not
do it
whatever we end up calling it. IMO the only way to get people to do it
would
be to make it required, and I don't think that is a good idea.
I
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:28:45PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> I think even better than
>
> ok( $expr, "name" );
>
> or
>
> ok( $expr, "comment" );
>
> is
>
> ok( $expr, "label" );
>
> RJBS points out that "comment" implies "not really worth doing", and I
> still don't like "name" beca
On Tue 07 Dec 2004 05:28, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think even better than
>
> ok( $expr, "name" );
>
> or
>
> ok( $expr, "comment" );
>
> is
>
> ok( $expr, "label" );
or ok ($expr, "indicator");
or ok ($expr, "tag");
for me the name/comment/label/tag/indicator/... is
I think even better than
ok( $expr, "name" );
or
ok( $expr, "comment" );
is
ok( $expr, "label" );
RJBS points out that "comment" implies "not really worth doing", and I
still don't like "name" because it implies (to me) a unique identifier.
We also talked about "description", but "desc
