Re: Test op/stacks:29 dying.

2002-05-18 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 4:19 PM -0400 5/15/02, Kevin Falcone wrote: > > "BD" == Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >BD> Chris Ball: >BD> # (Note: My first attempt at this message bounced from >BD> # onion.perl.org, which is why it's going to p6i. Reported to >BD> # [EMAIL PROTECTED], who's looking into it.)

Re: Test op/stacks:29 dying.

2002-05-15 Thread Kevin Falcone
> "BD" == Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BD> Chris Ball: BD> # (Note: My first attempt at this message bounced from BD> # onion.perl.org, which is why it's going to p6i. Reported to BD> # [EMAIL PROTECTED], who's looking into it.) BD> # == BD> # Seems to be cross-x86, if not global

[netlabs #584] RE: Test op/stacks:29 dying.

2002-05-15 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Brent Dax # Please include the string: [netlabs #584] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=584 > Peter Gibbs: # Chris Ball wrote: # # > t/op/stacks.ok 28/29#Failed test (t/

RE: Test op/stacks:29 dying.

2002-05-15 Thread Brent Dax
Peter Gibbs: # Chris Ball wrote: # # > t/op/stacks.ok 28/29#Failed test (t/op/stacks.t # at line 592) # > # got: '' # > # expected: '43210-1 # # This test has a missing 'end' in the code and segfaults. Patch below. # # -- # Peter Gibbs # EmKel Systems # # Index: t/op

RE: Test op/stacks:29 dying.

2002-05-15 Thread Brent Dax
Chris Ball: # (Note: My first attempt at this message bounced from # onion.perl.org, which is why it's going to p6i. Reported to # [EMAIL PROTECTED], who's looking into it.) # == # Seems to be cross-x86, if not global. # # t/op/stacks.ok 28/29#Failed test (t/op/stacks.t # at li

[netlabs #583] Re: Test op/stacks:29 dying.

2002-05-15 Thread Peter Gibbs
# New Ticket Created by "Peter Gibbs" # Please include the string: [netlabs #583] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=583 > Chris Ball wrote: > t/op/stacks.ok 28/29#Failed test (t/op/stacks.t at

Re: Test op/stacks:29 dying.

2002-05-15 Thread Peter Gibbs
Chris Ball wrote: > t/op/stacks.ok 28/29#Failed test (t/op/stacks.t at line 592) > # got: '' > # expected: '43210-1 This test has a missing 'end' in the code and segfaults. Patch below. -- Peter Gibbs EmKel Systems Index: t/op/stacks.t

Test op/stacks:29 dying.

2002-05-15 Thread Chris Ball
(Note: My first attempt at this message bounced from onion.perl.org, which is why it's going to p6i. Reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED], who's looking into it.) == Seems to be cross-x86, if not global. t/op/stacks.ok 28/29#Failed test (t/op/stacks.t at line 592) # got: '' #